Justin Kirk ?

[daphnerocks]

Posted: 1/26/04 at 1:18am

He was on a TV show right, so when he was overlooked for Angels, the nominators were familiar with his show, I think "Jack and Jill". Very strange how Jeffrey Wright didn't even mention him?

[Mister Matt]

Posted: 1/26/04 at 10:29am

Maybe they don't get along?

[DefyingGravity2]

Posted: 1/26/04 at 6:10pm

YES or he thanked the cast and like, his fellow nominees.... and there isn't anything wrong with that.
!!

[cbrown828]

Posted: 1/26/04 at 9:36pm

HIS ROLE WAS TO BIG TO BE IN THE SUPPORTING CATEGORY. IF HE WAS NOMINATED IT WOULD BE IN THE LEAD ACTOR CATEGORY AND HE WOULD HAVE LOST TO AL PACINO ANYWAY. I THINK IT WAS BECAUSE HE WASN'T A BIG NAME ACTOR AND THE WENT WITH THE BIG NAME, PACINO AS BEST ACTOR.

[jrb_actor]

Posted: 1/27/04 at 1:28am

No matter where you put any of the actors, the best male performances were Pacino and Wright. The best female were Streep and Parker. The Golden Globes got it right.

[cmleidi]

Posted: 1/27/04 at 2:09am

I don't understand what all the fuss is about Kirk's performance. Kirk (and Thompson) were the weakest parts of the film for me. Kirk was fine, but he could have and should have been much better than he was.

[DefyingGravity2]

Posted: 1/27/04 at 3:27pm

I thought kirk was amazing. EVIDENTLY there was a mess up, having originally nominated him in thesupporting catagory and then trying to switch him to lead, they messed something up. Fingers Crossed for the emmy's.