I tried searching for a thread, so my apologies if it exists.
What revivals of failed shows have become bona fide "hits" their 2nd or 3rd time around.
I'd been thinking about Side Show, Carrie, Bare and Ragtime, specifically. I know Chicago is WAY more successful than it original run, but was the original run a flop?
I guess I'm trying to figure out why financial backers are willing to try again with failed material. Maybe there are a whole bunch I'm not thinking of.
The original production of Sam Shepherd's "True West" produced by the Public Theatre was a disaster. It wasn't until it was revived by Steppenwolf with a then unknown Gary Sinise and John Malkovich that it became a hit.
Updated On: 11/3/14 at 01:33 PM
BOEING-BOEING.
The original production didn't last a month. The revival won several Tonys, made money, and ran for nearly a year.
And I adored that revival production!!!! Amazing!!!
The original Porgy and Bess lost quite a bit of money, but since then it has has several productions be successful.
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/1/14
The Cripple of Inishmaan - The 1998 Public Theater production was not well-received. But when the Atlantic brought over an Irish production of it in 2008/2009, it did well both critically and commercially, very nearly moving to Broadway. And this past year's revival with Radcliffe was a big critical success, although I don't think it recouped.
Stand-by Joined: 4/4/11
The Rocky Horror Show. The original production was a major flop, but the revival ran for over a year.
Candide (1956) 73 performances, BOMB!!!!!
Candide (1973) Chelsea Theatre/BAM/Broadway revival, 740 performances, huge hit, four tony's including best book (reworked) and direction of a musical
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/20/03
I wouldn't call the original "Ragtime" a failure. It had an excellent cast and was a visually stunning production. It may not have recouped investment, but there was a lot of cooking the books. Also, it was in such a huge theater. I think it could have run longer if it moved to a smaller house.
IIRC, Brecht/Weill's THREEPENNY OPERA was performed in English in the U.S. in the 1920s to a collective yawn. Another version, translated by Mark Blitzstein, opened off-Broadway in the 1950s and ran for years.
Their MAHAGONNY SONG CYCLE was booed off the stage when it debuted (in Munich, I believe) but went on to be a hit in Berlin and, with revisions, on opera stages all over the world.
Ditto for Jarry's UBU ROI. Not just booing but a full-fledged riot.
Theater used to be fun!
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/29/08
^ No. If it was a flop they wouldn't have transferred it. It did very well at NYTW.
Stand-by Joined: 11/28/11
Not a revival, but Seussical didn't do so well on Broadway, but gets produced regionally all the time.
The first US production of The Threepenny Opera was on Broadway at the Empire Theater in 1933, for 12 performances in less than two weeks. The sets and costumes were based on the originals in Germany. New York was not ready!
Seussical, like The Addams Family, was substantially revised after Broadway, and the revised versions are generally considered better.
Updated On: 11/4/14 at 06:57 PM
I am looking at Broadway revivals...not life in regional productions.
KISS OF THE SPIDERWPMAN isn't perfectly analogous because its development process was unique. But in their book, COLORED LIGHTS, Kander and Ebb make a point of what a failure the musical was in Purchase, NY (and how damning Rich's review was) and then what a joy it was to have the show be a success on Broadway two years later.
Since the original question was why backers invest in something that lost money in the past, KOTS seems to be a prime example of belated success.
Featured Actor Joined: 8/2/05
In England, Blood Brothers flopped in its first run on the West End in 1983. A revival in 1988 ran until 2012, transferred to Broadway for two years, and spawned numerous tours.
Videos