#1
Posted: 7/14/05 at 6:49am
Last night our Louise quit Gypsy (2 weeks before tech week) because she didn't think she needed an understudy. What the crap?
#2
Posted: 7/14/05 at 6:58am
I would assume the understudy was cast at the same time she was, in which case this is just an excuse to get out of the production. I wonder what the real problem is?
#3
Posted: 7/14/05 at 7:03am
i say good job they have an understudy then!
Jesus Loves You... Everybody else thinks you're an idiot!
#4
Posted: 7/14/05 at 7:44am
Actually the understudy was just added last week
Updated On: 7/14/05 at 07:44 AM
#5
Posted: 7/14/05 at 9:33am
Good luck with her ever working again. Theatre people don't forgive or forget easily. Obviously, she did need an understudy if she quits a show for some immature vain reason like that. What makes her better than, oh, EVERY BROADWAY PERFORMER?
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
#6
Posted: 7/14/05 at 9:44am
yep...she was very good but the director of this show happens to be the founder of the theatre...she will never work in that theatre again.
#8
Posted: 7/24/05 at 5:00pm
devil's advocate: why was the understudy hired a week ago?
did she know there was no understudy until a week ago?
did something happen to motivate the powers that be to hire an understudy?
did she know there was no understudy until a week ago?
did something happen to motivate the powers that be to hire an understudy?
