Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows TRAILER

[spiderdj82]

Posted: 12/5/09 at 8:04pm

I peed myself a little

[Q]

Posted: 12/5/09 at 8:08pm

I was absolutely outside the norm on the last one, since I hated it. Completely.

But I'll see these, and see it through to the end.

[wicked_beast4]

Posted: 12/5/09 at 8:32pm

I am SO EXCITED! I started jumping up and down when I saw this earlier! It looks great!

[Mr Roxy]

Posted: 12/5/09 at 8:44pm

2 parts. Very smart move on WB part.

[Roscoe]

Posted: 12/5/09 at 9:03pm

A shame they couldn't get Cuaron back to direct. His PRISONER OF AZKABAN is still by very very very far the best of the series. And I don't really see the point of stretching it out into two parts over so many months. LORD OF THE RINGS this ain't.

[violet72]

Posted: 12/5/09 at 9:17pm

I think they are doing 2 parts to cover everything they cut out of the other movies that came back up in the last book

[Pippin]

Posted: 12/5/09 at 9:31pm

The only reason they are doing two parts is WB wants to make as much money off of their final HP movie as possible. Two parts = two movie tickets = twice the revenue.

it is purely a financial reason and has no artistic merit or reasoning to it at all. Lord of the rings: return of the king was over three hours; why can't Deathly Hallows be? because the big wigs want to stuff their pockets and go out with not only one, but two big bangs.

yes, I am a little unhappy about this decision still, even though I heard about it a while ago. It still gets under my skin.

[Q]

Posted: 12/5/09 at 9:33pm

"I don't really see the point of stretching it out into two parts"

You're kidding, right?

2+ billion as opposed to 1+ billion . . .

That's a real head-scratcher, huh?

[kec]

Posted: 12/5/09 at 9:42pm

Spider, the video at your link was deleted about 30 minutes ago.

BTW have you seen the Doctor Who Christmas Ident for BBC?

[spiderdj82]

Posted: 12/5/09 at 9:58pm

Oh dammit all. I'm sure it's on youtube or the WB website somewhere.

Kec - The what?

[gertiecummings]

Posted: 12/6/09 at 12:44am

Screw the money. Story-wise it has to be two movies, in order to fit everything in.

[Q]

Posted: 12/6/09 at 12:47am

"Story-wise it has to be two movies, in order to fit everything in."

That could have applied to the last 2 flicks at least, but wasn't.

This isn't neccessary, except to line wallets.

[Taryn]

Posted: 12/6/09 at 5:26am

Not sure if this is the same video, but. I'm guessing it is!

http://video.the-leaky-cauldron.org/video/1410

[kec]

Posted: 12/6/09 at 7:08am

Spider, check out my link in the Doctor Who thread. It's a special station identification for BBC1 for Christmas featuring the Doctor.

[D2]

Posted: 12/8/09 at 7:43am

Apparently Harry is going to have a nude scene in the final film? I guess they saw how much money EQUUS made and decided to enlarge, ahem, upon that.

Digitally.

Updated On: 12/8/09 at 07:43 AM

[BDrischBDemented]

Posted: 12/8/09 at 10:43am

Well... he is nude in the book, too.