Harry Potter- Page 2

[Broadwaylilhead]

Posted: 6/7/04 at 2:34pm

Well, they are already on Week 2 of filming and its a one film deal. Then the debate is to keep the kids or replace them. I can not reinvest in all new actors. I think they will destroy the series if they replace the kids

[popcultureboy]

Posted: 6/7/04 at 2:36pm

There isn't any need to replace the kids, I don't think. If Stockard Channing can get away with it, so can they.

[ckeaton]

Posted: 6/7/04 at 2:43pm

Well... if they keep on this schedule, I can't wait for the last one. By then Emma Watson will be a very attractive ingenue.

She's a very pretty girl, going to be a beautiful woman in a few years.

[Broadwaylilhead]

Posted: 6/7/04 at 2:46pm

not to mention what a little hottie Malfoy is becoming...

[jrb_actor]

Posted: 6/7/04 at 9:19pm

I remember that Columbus and a couple of others wanted it to be a 2 parter way before Kill Bill proved that it could be done successfully. (Unlike the Matrix's relative flop).

I also read today in EW that Cuaron had convinced them to make it one film--perhaps how to make it work. It better be a long film--there is WAY too much story to cut.