tracker
My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!
Home For You Chat My Shows (beta) Register/Login Games Grosses
pixeltracker

Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still

Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still

nexttoelectric Profile Photo
nexttoelectric
#1Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 1:30am

So I looking at HuffPo and they linked to an article on LATimes online about debunking scientific misconceptions and something struck me as odd. the last line of the first paragrpah, "and douching with Coca-Cola is not an effective contraceptive method."

Is this something that people actually believe? Ladies? Is this a common misconception that anyone of you ever had or know anyone that has???



ETA nevermind. I read the whole article. "Coca-Cola douches for pregnancy prevention were a part of folklore in the 1950s and 1960s, before the contraceptive pill. People thought that the acidity of the soda would kill sperm and that the classic Coke bottle provided a convenient "shake and shoot" applicator."


WHAT THE F*CK WAS WRONG WITH PEOPLE IN THE 50S AND 60S???
Here's the crazy ass article. Updated On: 12/20/08 at 01:30 AM

Phyllis Rogers Stone
#2re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 2:04am

My paternal grandmother told the entire family that she tried to abort her youngest child by bathing in LysolTM.

nexttoelectric Profile Photo
nexttoelectric
#2re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 2:21am

OH MY GOD. Are you ****ing kidding me?

Now theres a story for the grandkids.

tazber Profile Photo
tazber
#3re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 2:22am

I don't even know what to say to you Phyllis, that's just horrible.


....but the world goes 'round

Phyllis Rogers Stone
#4re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 2:28am

Swear to god. She was a crazy old bitch.

mauriposa
#5re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 2:30am

... Wow.

Phyllis Rogers Stone
#6re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 2:34am

And she named her Lynn, which, you may notice, starts with the same two letters and you know what!

nexttoelectric Profile Photo
nexttoelectric
#7re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 2:37am

Did she give birth on the linoleum??

Phyllis Rogers Stone
#8re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 2:39am

I don't think so, but she grew up to be crazy!

nexttoelectric Profile Photo
nexttoelectric
#9re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 2:39am

yeah, sorry, that was a Trailer Park reference.

tazber Profile Photo
tazber
#10re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 2:40am

that whole "Ly" connection is just disturbing.


....but the world goes 'round

Elphaba Profile Photo
Elphaba
#11re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 10:44am

"Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still"

Move the "still" to after "Times" and you have a proper sentence.


It is ridiculous to set a detective story in New York City. New York City is itself a detective story... AGATHA CHRISTIE, Life magazine, May 14, 1956

nexttoelectric Profile Photo
nexttoelectric
#12re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 10:59am

thank you Stalin, but frankly i couldn't give a ****.

Elphaba Profile Photo
Elphaba
#13re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 11:06am

That is painfully obvious by your horrid use of your written word.

Obviously you also do not know history. Stalin would never have cared how his language was mangled.

Now had you chosen Shakespeare, Walt Whitman, or another author than your failed insult might make more sense.
However, based on your past posts I'm not sure you know how to read.



It is ridiculous to set a detective story in New York City. New York City is itself a detective story... AGATHA CHRISTIE, Life magazine, May 14, 1956
Updated On: 12/20/08 at 11:06 AM

nexttoelectric Profile Photo
nexttoelectric
#14re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 11:14am

I used Stalin because i've seen people freak out for being called a grammar nazi.

So, what's up your ass today?

Elphaba Profile Photo
Elphaba
#15re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 12:58pm

nada, just don't like when people butcher the language.

I'm proud to be a grammar Nazi, and I suppose that would make me a Jewish Grammar Nazi, lol.

My mother majored in both English and math, so one of them had to stick. I got the English gene, my sister the math gene.

I just have to correct people, it's not my fault, it's in the genes. It's a disease, but it's not fatal.




It is ridiculous to set a detective story in New York City. New York City is itself a detective story... AGATHA CHRISTIE, Life magazine, May 14, 1956
Updated On: 12/20/08 at 12:58 PM

nexttoelectric Profile Photo
nexttoelectric
#16re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 1:09pm

I have an english degree as well, and when i write in a non conversational manner i have near perfect grammar, I correct people as well, but only in person when we're actually speaking. I could pretty much give a **** if you post on a message board in perfect grammar, as long as the sentence makes sense and is, you know, not wrtn lyk ths, I'm good, i have bigger things to worry about, like which one of you queers stole my girdle.

morosco Profile Photo
morosco
#17re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 1:51pm

That is painfully obvious by your horrid use of your written word.

Obviosuly you also do not know history. Stalin would never have cared how his language was mangled.

Now had you chosen Shakespeare, Walt Whitman, or another author than your failed insult might make more sense.
However, based on your past posts I'm not sure you know how to read.


I hate to bring it up but there is a typo in your rant.

Elphaba Profile Photo
Elphaba
#18re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 2:22pm

Thanks for letting me know, I've corrected it.


It is ridiculous to set a detective story in New York City. New York City is itself a detective story... AGATHA CHRISTIE, Life magazine, May 14, 1956

morosco Profile Photo
morosco
#19re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 2:38pm

No need for thanks. (The word English should be spelled with a capital E.)

My mother majored in both english and math, so one of them had to stick. I got the english gene, my sister the math gene.

Phyllis Rogers Stone
#20re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 3:44pm

There's actually another misused word in there as well. :)

Can't we please get back to talking about my grandmother and the lysol?

TheatreDiva90016 Profile Photo
TheatreDiva90016
#21re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 3:46pm

Yes.

Did it skip a generation?


"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>> “I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>> -whatever2

Elphaba Profile Photo
Elphaba
#22re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/20/08 at 8:06pm

oh good grief, can't you both just give it to me all at once.

Oh my, that sentence alone got me excited!


It is ridiculous to set a detective story in New York City. New York City is itself a detective story... AGATHA CHRISTIE, Life magazine, May 14, 1956

JewFace Profile Photo
JewFace
#23re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/21/08 at 4:09am

re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still


You uhh... you sure an abortion was her original intent?

tommyboy
#24re: Is the LA Times a legitimate newspaper still
Posted: 12/21/08 at 7:30am

Hey JF -- What is the zip code for Bloomfield N.J.?

You know, just in case...


Videos