i think they have little understanding or appreciation for irony as we know it. looking now at the fact that this came 911 days after 9/11, it's impossible to rule it as a coincidence in my mind. however, while everyone is quick to blame al qaeda and while they surely did have a hand in this, i think that thye were assisted to a great extent by eta. one need only look at who benefits from al qaeda taking the credit/blame for the attack.
eta wants to get someone a little more to their liking in the presidential palace as does al qaeda, since aznar has been a big ol' vocal supporter in words and actions of gw's war on terror. now, if eta gets blamed, aznar gets re-elected in a landslide. but, if al qaeda gets the blame then the fault can be laid at aznar's feet as a result of his chumminess with gw. hence he stands a greater chance of being defeated so both players get what they want.
the over the top nature of clues pointing to al qaeda and the multitudinous calls for recognition of blame all look a bit too pat. it's perfectly feasible that the 3/11 date (being 911 days after 9/11), falling as it did so close to the election, was chosen for maximum visibility and to immediately link the two together. thus again strengthening the al qaeda link.
my money is that they did it together. at the very least it was some rogue eta members who hooked up with the al qaeda off shoot folks and worked things out and gave them material support.
r.i.p. marco, my guardian angel.
...global warming can manifest itself as heat, cool, precipitation, storms, drought, wind, or any other phenomenon, much like a shapeshifter. -- jim geraghty
pray to st. jude
i'm a sonic reducer
he was the gimmicky sort
fenchurch=mejusthavingfun=magwildwood=mmousefan=bkcollector=bradmajors=somethingtotalkabout: the fenchurch mpd collective