My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!
pixeltracker

Peter pan sequel

Peter pan sequel

jjdude2000
#0Peter pan sequel
Posted: 3/13/05 at 9:09pm

An author has been chosen in a search to find the right person to write a sequel to PETER PAN, originally written by J.M. Barrie.

A sequel? What does everyone thinK?
Link


Grace: I just gave a quarter to a homeless man. I think it was Johnny Depp.

Elphaba Profile Photo
Elphaba
#1re: Peter pan sequel
Posted: 3/13/05 at 9:14pm

some things should not have sequels


It is ridiculous to set a detective story in New York City. New York City is itself a detective story... AGATHA CHRISTIE, Life magazine, May 14, 1956

TxTwoStep Profile Photo
TxTwoStep
#2re: Peter pan sequel
Posted: 3/13/05 at 9:21pm

aren't there actually a series of Peter Pan books by the original author?


Will: They don't give out awards for helping people be gay... unless you count the Tonys. "I guarantee that we'll have tough times. I guarantee that at some point one or both of us will want to get out. But I also guarantee that if I don't ask you to be mine, I'll regret it for the rest of my life..."

TxTwoStep Profile Photo
TxTwoStep
#3re: Peter pan sequel
Posted: 3/13/05 at 9:21pm

and at least one play, possibly called PETER AND WENDY?


Will: They don't give out awards for helping people be gay... unless you count the Tonys. "I guarantee that we'll have tough times. I guarantee that at some point one or both of us will want to get out. But I also guarantee that if I don't ask you to be mine, I'll regret it for the rest of my life..."

CapnHook Profile Photo
CapnHook
#4re: Peter pan sequel
Posted: 3/13/05 at 9:56pm

Ahem - *clears throat*:

J.M. Barrie's play, PETER PAN, OR THE BOY WHO WOULDN'T GROW UP was first performec on December 27, 1904. It's now celebrating its 100th Anniversary.

Barrie adapted his play into a novel in 1911, essentially the same plot.

The first mentioning of the character "Peter Pan" was a chapted in Barrie's 1902 novel THE LITTLE WHITE BIRD. Later in 1906, this chapter was published as its own little novel (nothing changed): PETER PAN IN KENSINGTON GARDENS. This is considered by some as a "prequel" to PETER PAN. In it, Peter is an infant living in Kensington Gardens in London. He has yet to venture to Neverland and stop growing up.

So no, there wasn't a SERIES. The novel was entitled PETER & WENDY.

For more information, visit my website: http://www.peterpanfan.com/new/home.php


"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle

BlueWizard Profile Photo
BlueWizard
#5re: Peter pan sequel
Posted: 3/14/05 at 1:59am

A sequel to PETER PAN? You mean Stephen Spielberg's HOOK?


BlueWizard's blog: The Rambling Corner HEDWIG: "The road is my home. In reflecting upon the people whom I have come upon in my travels, I cannot help but think of the people who have come upon me."

CapnHook Profile Photo
CapnHook
#6re: Peter pan sequel
Posted: 3/15/05 at 11:23pm

HOOK is not a sequel. It's an original film with a script based on the idea "What if Peter Pan grew up?"

NOT a sequel.

Disney has a "sequel" to their Peter Pan film, RETURN TO NEVERLAND, but Disney doesn't own Peter Pan. The Great Ormond Street Hospital does.

There will never be an "official" sequel since Barrie is gone (Barrie did write one, sort of, however unpublished). Although this new novel is as close as we will get.


"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle

Unknown User
#7re: Peter pan sequel
Posted: 3/16/05 at 12:32am

Can't the Hospital just renew copywrite? I'm sure there's some special claus they can fit into the law...

CapnHook Profile Photo
CapnHook
#8re: Peter pan sequel
Posted: 3/16/05 at 11:24pm

The copyrights were already extended. Parliment already made a claim decades ago that the copyrights would *never* expire in the UK, but its not being inforced. They know it wouldn't be fair.


"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle

JohnPopa Profile Photo
JohnPopa
#9re: Peter pan sequel
Posted: 3/16/05 at 11:26pm

Fan fiction is fan fiction.

Writers should spend more time developing their own ideas, instead of madly trying to latch onto other writers' original ideas.


Videos