Moral equivalencies are not a debating technique. They are an attempt to have the final word and choke off the rest of the conversation by introducing guilt as a supposed trump card. PJ, if you would climb down off your high horse for a moment, you might realize that my post was an ironic response to the argument that Middle Eastern atrocities justify any response, regardless of the collateral damage.
My point was not to induce guilt, but to expose hypocrisy. That IS a legitimate debate technique, whether you like it or not.
I in no way implied that Mr. Foley's assassination is justified by drone strikes.
Updated On: 8/22/14 at 08:16 PM