Skip to main content
My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!

Those Wacky Folks at P.E.T.A. are at it again

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.

#3

re: Terrorist organization P.E.T.A. is at it again

No...you misread. I wasn't saying that this particular stunt was an act of terrorism but I did note that the organization is famous for using terrorist tactics for their causes.
#5

re: Terrorist organization P.E.T.A. is at it again

He didn't misread, you misrepresented.

I thought the same after reading the article you linked to your post. PETA's actions in this case are disgusting, offensive and racist. But there were no acts of terrorism committed.

I'm not attacking you, but words have power. And you shouldn't misuse that power.
#7

re: Terrorist organization P.E.T.A. is at it again

Yeah. I guess you guys are right. I just researched and noticed that after 9/11 PETA's website equated the terrorist attacks with eating meat. So that kinda screws around with me calling them terrorists. So until further notice, I'm going to change my subject line to read "Those Wacky Folks at P.E.T.A. are at it again". Let me know if everyone is comfortable with that.
#9

re: Terrorist organization P.E.T.A. is at it again

A couple years ago they did a exhibition putting photos of animal slaughtering next to photographs from the Holocaust and got a LOT of people upset (for obvious reasons).

I wouldn't call these sort of tactics terrorism, but I would certainly call them offensive and insensitive.
-Anyone want to turn anarchist with me?

"Bless you and all who know you, oh wise and penguined one." ~YouWantItWhen????
#11

re: Terrorist organization P.E.T.A. is at it again

Of course, it's not like The American Farm Bureau Federation has their own agenda, either.
"How do you like THAT 'misanthropic panache,' Mr. Goldstone?" - PalJoey
#12

re: Terrorist organization P.E.T.A. is at it again


the point theyre making is that an animals life is as important as a human life and theyre equating 'animal' as a sort of 'race' but most people dont hold animals in that high of a regard to compare it to the life of another human (well, atleast Americans rarely would) so many would find the comparison ridiculous and thus also offensive. im definitely not a fan of this but i understood the message they were attempting to send.
#13

re: Terrorist organization P.E.T.A. is at it again

I like animals as well as the next person but I am sorry but I do not think of a raccoon & person as being equal. Peta should go after the blood thirsty animals who kill each other in the wild. After all , Mr Lion, don't kill that gazelle . Just starve. Imagine if no animals were ever killed by other animals or man. Bit crowded wouldn't you say

If you want to think of animals as equal & do not eat them, fine. Do not force Peta views on others

Poster Emeritus

Updated On: 8/14/05 at 10:17 AM

#14

re: Terrorist organization P.E.T.A. is at it again

Once again, a metaphor that shows a lack of taste, especially right after 9/11, if the "reportage" of the American Farm Bureau is accurate.

But what's inaccurate is what appears to be the writer's COMPLETE inability to understand a message he just quoted. Look at the disconnect between paragraphs two and three. Never underestimate the human ability to miss a point, even if it is delivered in a manner lacking decorum.

On the front page of its web site, PETA equated the terrorist attacks with eating meat. "As we struggle to understand the violence that has been thrust upon us, we have an opportunity to seize control of some equally real violence and stop it." And then PETA asks, "Have our hearts and minds been closed to the unspeakable violence toward other innocents that takes place in our slaughterhouses, and do we not look violence in the eye three times a day – at breakfast, lunch and dinner?"

There are words to describe this diatribe that we won't print here. Suffice it to say if any of us thought giving up eating hamburgers would stop world terrorism, we would do it in a minute. Terrorism may have a number of root causes, but eating meat is not one of them.


Twitter @NamoInExile Instagram none
#15

re: Terrorist organization P.E.T.A. is at it again

"As we struggle to understand the violence that has been thrust upon us, we have an opportunity to seize control of some equally real violence and stop it."
#16

re: Terrorist organization P.E.T.A. is at it again

Let me spell it out for YOU, morosco.

"Suffice it to say if any of us thought giving up eating hamburgers would stop world terrorism, we would do it in a minute."

The Farm Bureau reporter seems to think that PETA's point is that if people didn't eat burgers there would have been no Sept. 11. But that is obviously not what they were saying and a deliberate misread. Unless the reported didn't have none of that fancy book learnin' like the uppity stuck ups in PETA.
Twitter @NamoInExile Instagram none
#17

re: Terrorist organization P.E.T.A. is at it again

Here's the entire "diatribe" that the AFBF misrepresented:

As we reel from the shock of the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, as we struggle to understand the violence that has been thrust upon us, we have an opportunity to seize control of some equally real violence and stop it. We are not powerless. We are thinking, feeling beings with choices that rule life and death for others. We have the power to cause unbearable pain and fear, and we must not exercise it. Now is a time to examine how we can reduce suffering in the world and be life-affirming: Have our hearts and minds been closed to the unspeakable violence toward other innocents that takes place in our slaughterhouses, and do we look violence in the eye three times a day—at breakfast, lunch, and dinner? Do not turn away. Please. Unlike the violence over which we have no control, there is something we can do about this. We can actually stop it. We can reach out to the victims of this slaughter through easy choices for our families and ourselves.


Whether or not one chooses to admit it, cooking and eating bits of an animal killed only for consumption is a form of violence. Meat is not just what you serve up on a platter at dinnertime. It is the flesh of living, thinking, suffering animals who feel pain every bit as much as we do, are horrified at the sights and smells of the slaughterhouse, and are afraid to die. On this very page you can see how PETA's own investigation of a typical U.S. pig farm showed that employees regularly beat young pigs with heavy metal rods, kicked them, and dashed their heads against the pavement to kill them.

Look beyond the neat packages wrapped in plastic in the tidy grocery store and you will find a bloody, ugly nightmare that millions of animals endure every day. It's every bit as terrifying to them as the news reports of the terrorists' work are to us. As a recent joint investigation by NBC's Dateline and The Washington Post revealed, many animals are conscious as they move down the slaughterhouse butchering lines. In violation of federal law, fully conscious pigs are screaming as they are dropped into tanks of boiling water and cows are looking workers in the eye as their hooves are cut off.

Dropping the flesh of animals from our diet probably wouldn't end the threat of terrorism, but it would lessen the amount of violence in our lives. Please do something to make the world a less violent place. Right now. We are here to help you make the switch.


http://www.peta.org/feat/wtc/


While the link to terrorism is of course specious (though there's plenty of precedent in our daily lives with that already), I believe they do make some logical points. And, as Namo pointed out, no where is a claim made that eating meat contributes to global terrorism.
"How do you like THAT 'misanthropic panache,' Mr. Goldstone?" - PalJoey
#18

re: Terrorist organization P.E.T.A. is at it again

"As we struggle to understand the violence that has been thrust upon us, we have an opportunity to seize control of some equally real violence and stop it."

What bothers me is how PETA equates 9/11 with eating meat. That's was my only point. I'm not saying that if people didn't eat burgers there would have been no Sept. 11.

#19

re: Terrorist organization P.E.T.A. is at it again

No, but the Farm Bureau report you cited from your "research" DID say that PETA was saying that. Which was my point.

So far nobody here is saying that using the 9.11 theme was a good strategy. What I've been looking for is clarification of your original headline on this thread and for an understanding that the Farm Bureau reporter appears to have deliberately misread the PETA campaign.
Twitter @NamoInExile Instagram none
#20

re: Terrorist organization P.E.T.A. is at it again

As I sit lounging on my chinchilla recliner, reading this on my lap top which is being supported by an elephant foot table as light gleams down from my antler chandelier, I have to take a quick nibble from my tray of assorted meats and think to myself, “What should I do about this? Should I take the chicken that I have marinating for this evening’s bar-b-que, and just bury it in the back yard so that it will make for good compost? Or, maybe I should blame my mother for feeding me Hamburger Helper when I was a child.

How is any of this related to 9/11?

"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>> “I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>> -whatever2

BroadwayWorld TV


Ticket Central
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $71