Go to the link and tell Newsweek what you think. Here are the choices:
Do you believe President Bush's actions justify impeachment?
* Yes, between the secret spying, the deceptions leading to war and more, there is plenty to justify putting him on trial.
* No, like any president, he has made a few missteps, but nothing approaching "high crimes and misdemeanors."
* No, the man has done absolutely nothing wrong. Impeachment would just be a political lynching.
* I don't know.
Vote here: Do you believe President Bush's actions justify impeachment?
88% said yes
I Voted.
It warms me to see that so many people are starting to wake up...
I didn't expect such an overwhelming response to this...
Impeach!!!!!!!!
It's down to 87% now.
VOTED!!
Isn't it interrrresting how the mainstream media is, once again, choosing to push this story into the margins?
New Bumper Sticker?
"IMPEACHMENT: It's not just for bl*wjobs anymore."
reading this q&a at the washington post offers a little insight into both this poll and to the media as bush accompolice.
wapo cites bush rising polls
WindyCityActor is my new hero.
Windy's been my hero for a long time.
70,601 votes, still amazingly at 87%.
Here's an article from Editor and Publisher about the mainstream press and the calls for impeachment.
The WaPo is no longer the maverick paper of Katharine Graham and Ben Bradlee's time. It's now a company paper in a company town. And poor Bob Woodward has gone from being Robert Redford to a slimy brown-noser.
snippet:
---
Suddenly this week, scattered outposts in the media have started mentioning the “I” word, or at least the “IO” phrase: impeach or impeachable offense.
The sudden outbreak of anger or candor—or, some might say, foolishness—has been sparked by the uproar over revelations of a White House approved domestic spying program, with some conservatives joining in the shouting.
Ron Hutcheson, White House correspondent for Knight Ridder Newspapers (known as “Hutch” to the president), observed that "some legal experts asserted that Bush broke the law on a scale that could warrant his impeachment.” Indeed such talk from legal experts was common in print or on cable news.
Newsweek online noted a “chorus” of impeachment chat, and its Washington reporter, Howard Fineman, declared that Bush opponents are “calling him Nixon 2.0 and have already hauled forth no less an authority than John Dean to testify to the president’s dictatorial perfidy. The ‘I-word’ is out there, and, I predict, you are going to hear more of it next year — much more.”
When chief Washington Post pollster Richard Morin appeared for an online chat, a reader from Naperville, Ill., asked him why the Post hasn't polled on impeachment. "This question makes me mad," Morin replied. When a second participant made the same query, Morin fumed, "Getting madder." A third query brought the response: "Madder still."
'Impeachment' Talk, Pro and Con, Appears in Media at Last
Alas....I found my bumper sticker wording from an anonymous post on the internet...I merely pass it on to you!
Can I still be your hero?
Updated On: 12/22/05 at 10:55 AM
Of course you are!
75,911 and still 87% !!
Of course you can still be my hero :)
Windy, anyone with that Avatar can be my hero as well.
This is my new suggestion for a bumper sticker.
What would Jesus Do? Impeach.

Aw! Shucks!!
Here's a Christmas Gift for All of You!
That just made my day!
Videos