democrats threaten to use impeachment as blackmail — Page 2
#27
Posted: 4/30/07 at 1:02pm
I think the only reason impeachment has been mentioned at all is because of Kucinich. That debate really sent some ripples to people in congress. Apparently their phones were ringing off the hooks with lefties pissed no one raised their hands.
Number #1 search on Yahoo this past weekend? Dennis Kucinich.
Not saying he has a chance it hell, but really it's about time Dem's grew some balls and accountability.
Number #1 search on Yahoo this past weekend? Dennis Kucinich.
Not saying he has a chance it hell, but really it's about time Dem's grew some balls and accountability.
#28
Posted: 4/30/07 at 1:21pm
By September, we will be living in a very different America, an America that is looking at a corrupt failed presidency and wondering what to do about it.
Impeachment is only one of many options. Time will tell.
===
GOP leaders warn that they will need dramatic evidence of progress — something that has been in short supply in Iraq — to maintain support for the war.
"We need to get some better results from Iraq both politically, economically and militarily, and that needs to happen in the foreseeable future," said House Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), a Bush administration loyalist.
Several moderate Republicans have warned that they are preparing to switch sides unless the troop "surge" shows results.
"If the president's new strategy does not demonstrate significant results by August, then Congress should consider all options — including a redefinition of our mission and a gradual but significant withdrawal of our troops next year," said Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who last week voted against the withdrawal bill.
Democrats acknowledge that they are a long way from amassing the two-thirds majority needed in the House and Senate to override a presidential veto on any future war legislation. But they note that if a significant number of Republicans join them in supporting a withdrawal of combat troops, the pressure on Bush will increase.
"The deadline to start [a withdrawal] is going to be driven by the facts on the ground and public opinion, rather than legislation," said Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), a leading member of the House's Out of Iraq caucus. "By August or September … they will be overwhelmed by the facts."
LA Times: Congress' vote on Iraq war is only a prelude: A September progress report on the troop buildup could make things a lot harder for Bush and Republicans.
Impeachment is only one of many options. Time will tell.
===
GOP leaders warn that they will need dramatic evidence of progress — something that has been in short supply in Iraq — to maintain support for the war.
"We need to get some better results from Iraq both politically, economically and militarily, and that needs to happen in the foreseeable future," said House Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), a Bush administration loyalist.
Several moderate Republicans have warned that they are preparing to switch sides unless the troop "surge" shows results.
"If the president's new strategy does not demonstrate significant results by August, then Congress should consider all options — including a redefinition of our mission and a gradual but significant withdrawal of our troops next year," said Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who last week voted against the withdrawal bill.
Democrats acknowledge that they are a long way from amassing the two-thirds majority needed in the House and Senate to override a presidential veto on any future war legislation. But they note that if a significant number of Republicans join them in supporting a withdrawal of combat troops, the pressure on Bush will increase.
"The deadline to start [a withdrawal] is going to be driven by the facts on the ground and public opinion, rather than legislation," said Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), a leading member of the House's Out of Iraq caucus. "By August or September … they will be overwhelmed by the facts."
LA Times: Congress' vote on Iraq war is only a prelude: A September progress report on the troop buildup could make things a lot harder for Bush and Republicans.
#29
Posted: 4/30/07 at 1:57pm
I just don't understand. There is absolutely no way this bill would end the war. It is not a complete troop withdrawal. There is money in this bill to continue this war for years, and it is a green light for the privatization of Iraqi oil.
As far as I can tell an approval from democrats to privatize oil is justifying the whole the real reason we went to war.
Pushing this bill is wrong, Hillary and Obama have some 'splanin to do. This bill is not an answer to the ’06 election. It is a red herring.
As far as I can tell an approval from democrats to privatize oil is justifying the whole the real reason we went to war.
Pushing this bill is wrong, Hillary and Obama have some 'splanin to do. This bill is not an answer to the ’06 election. It is a red herring.
#30
Posted: 4/30/07 at 2:05pm
Politics is dirty, papa, please don't act like you think it's not, regadless of who's being the pain this week. Of course it's blackmail--putting fear into your rival to get what you want. They ALL do that. And it's not as if Murtha is the first to speak of impeaching Bush.
That's the most unfortunate consequence of the Clinton impeachment--the bar for impeachment has been dramatically lowered and it's probably going to be a constant threat by the opposition party for many elections to come.
And papa, all pols put pork in their bills--it's called POLITICS.
That's the most unfortunate consequence of the Clinton impeachment--the bar for impeachment has been dramatically lowered and it's probably going to be a constant threat by the opposition party for many elections to come.
And papa, all pols put pork in their bills--it's called POLITICS.
#31
Posted: 4/30/07 at 2:09pm
I just can't figure why we even have impeachment if it can't be used for instances of lying people into war.
#32
Posted: 4/30/07 at 2:10pm
lildogs is right--it's completely disingenuous for you to cry, "Pork! Pork!" today while you have been silent about so much obvious and corrupt pork, graft and blatant bribery doled out to your side during all those years of Republican hegemony.
#33
Posted: 4/30/07 at 2:28pm
The only real pork in this bill is the oil legislation.
#34
Posted: 4/30/07 at 2:47pm
There's pork on both sides, PJ--it's totally vers!
#35
Posted: 4/30/07 at 2:47pm
mejust--it's more complicated than merely being a question of "Is impeachment warranted?" Every Democrat and increasing numbers of Republicans are already convinced that it's warranted.
The important question is "Is there a will among the American people to undergo impeachment?" Without that will it can not go forward, because impeachment is almost as wrenching to the heart and soul of the country as is assassination.
It also requires a large number of Americans who voted for Bush to admit to themselves they made a mistake in doing so--twice! Look at PapaLovesMambo: He STILL believes his votes for Bush were the right thing to do, despite all evidence to the contrary.
And since the misguided Clinton impeachment, it now requires a large number of Americans who supported that impeachment to say, "I was wrong about that one, but let's do it again."
Most people are unable to admit they've been wrong: Just look at yourself as a case in point--you NEVER do.
The important question is "Is there a will among the American people to undergo impeachment?" Without that will it can not go forward, because impeachment is almost as wrenching to the heart and soul of the country as is assassination.
It also requires a large number of Americans who voted for Bush to admit to themselves they made a mistake in doing so--twice! Look at PapaLovesMambo: He STILL believes his votes for Bush were the right thing to do, despite all evidence to the contrary.
And since the misguided Clinton impeachment, it now requires a large number of Americans who supported that impeachment to say, "I was wrong about that one, but let's do it again."
Most people are unable to admit they've been wrong: Just look at yourself as a case in point--you NEVER do.
Updated On: 4/30/07 at 02:47 PM
#36
Papa,
Sorry I can't buy: " Without that will it can not go forward, because impeachment is almost as wrenching to the heart and soul of the country as is assassination. "
The American people didn't seem so hesitant on their way to war with Iraq. I doubt very much an impeachment would actually have much if any ill affect on people in this country. The investigations have to happen anyway.
You are just repeating the same lazy rhetoric that the pussi Democrats have been using to keep themselves on the good side of the country.
All these lies, they are so very wrong. Why oh why the cover-up for OIL? WHY? The people in this country deserve better guidance. The last thing they need is the same politicians (who voted and supported this war) to keep making the same bad decisions over and over again.
Sorry Papa, time to let the real liberals drive.
Posted: 4/30/07 at 3:15pm
Papa,
Sorry I can't buy: " Without that will it can not go forward, because impeachment is almost as wrenching to the heart and soul of the country as is assassination. "
The American people didn't seem so hesitant on their way to war with Iraq. I doubt very much an impeachment would actually have much if any ill affect on people in this country. The investigations have to happen anyway.
You are just repeating the same lazy rhetoric that the pussi Democrats have been using to keep themselves on the good side of the country.
All these lies, they are so very wrong. Why oh why the cover-up for OIL? WHY? The people in this country deserve better guidance. The last thing they need is the same politicians (who voted and supported this war) to keep making the same bad decisions over and over again.
Sorry Papa, time to let the real liberals drive.
Updated On: 4/30/07 at 03:15 PM
#37
Posted: 4/30/07 at 3:33pm
I'm not "Papa." Papa is "Papa."
I'm "papi" maybe, but only in private.
And I am neither a "real" liberal or a fake liberal.
I am I, PalJoey.
I'm "papi" maybe, but only in private.
And I am neither a "real" liberal or a fake liberal.
I am I, PalJoey.
#38
Posted: 4/30/07 at 3:40pm
So what about Condi lying all day yesterday all over the tube. That woman is destroying herself.
#39
Posted: 4/30/07 at 3:45pm
Nothing surprises me with the democrats.
#40
Posted: 4/30/07 at 3:49pm
Amanda watch who you support, I enjoy a pearl necklace.
#41
Posted: 4/30/07 at 3:52pm
Ah, excuse me, but everyone has the right to support for their party of choice. And I'm not with Hillary. Put it that way.
#42
Posted: 4/30/07 at 3:57pm
Poor Condi...bet she wishes she was practicing scales with Amaryllis....
#43
Posted: 5/1/07 at 11:55am
I was right about what Murtha meant.
===
A clarification from Murtha spokesman Matt Mazonkey:
"The Congressman was asked about the ways to influence a President. He did list impeachment as one of four ways. He listed public opinion, the election, impeachment, and the power of the purse. But he doesn't believe that impeachment is appropriate at this time."
===
A clarification from Murtha spokesman Matt Mazonkey:
"The Congressman was asked about the ways to influence a President. He did list impeachment as one of four ways. He listed public opinion, the election, impeachment, and the power of the purse. But he doesn't believe that impeachment is appropriate at this time."
#44
Posted: 5/1/07 at 12:07pm
What happens when public opinion is impeachment? I supposed expecting a resignation from our president and vice president is out of the question. (Here's hoping it is gonna happen with Olmert).
Again these leaders led us to war. Their beliefs, predictions and assumptions cannot be trusted. None of them are ready to fess up. Even if Hillary apologizes, she will never admit why she really voted in the first place.
Again these leaders led us to war. Their beliefs, predictions and assumptions cannot be trusted. None of them are ready to fess up. Even if Hillary apologizes, she will never admit why she really voted in the first place.
#45
Posted: 5/1/07 at 12:13pm
QUESTION:
What happens when public opinion is impeachment?
ANSWER:
What happens when public opinion is impeachment?
ANSWER:
#47
Posted: 5/1/07 at 12:24pm
Now THAT'S funny...
I think the majority of people would prefer some action and some solutions rather than some long, involved trial--let's get the boys and girls back, get our allies back, start working on getting off oil, break up the drug/healthcare monopolies and tax the rich folks!
I think the majority of people would prefer some action and some solutions rather than some long, involved trial--let's get the boys and girls back, get our allies back, start working on getting off oil, break up the drug/healthcare monopolies and tax the rich folks!
#48
Posted: 5/1/07 at 12:28pm
I just don't understand how we can move forward if no one admits the true reason we went to war.
We have wronged the world and the thing the US can never remember is that the world never forgets.
We have wronged the world and the thing the US can never remember is that the world never forgets.
BroadwayWorld TV
Ticket Central
