'elp 'elp ah'm being oppressed

so there can be as many threads that attack the president as need be, but i only get one if i choose to be pro-bush...and i guess i outta be happy to have that shouldn't i?

where are my free speech advocates?

---

so if i start more than one thread they'll be deleted?

---

Is papa referring in his head-line to the whimpers of threatened white, well-off hetrosexual men?

---

nah, master i'm referring to the three threads of mine that got deleted as would this one should jrb not respnded so quickly to it.

actually, i posted my four bush threads as a lark. having seen all of anti-bush threads and the uproar that they created, i began to wonder what several threads that took the opposite side of the argument might create. now, i think that i've been a fairly reasonable poster and a pretty good board member if i do say so myself. and i do.

so i was a kinda shocked to see my threads disappear in faster than you could say lickity split. i understand that the board and the community and the city (nyc) are on the other side if the fence from me, but i did not post anything offensive. just did the same thing that another poster did.

now, i totally respect that multiple posts may be removed and support that. as i respect the moderators to remove any threads that they deem to be innappropriate. i just wonder if i'd been bashing the president if they'd have been tossed so quickly.

orion, i'll even get ya a bucket!

---

Updated On: 2/25/04 at 11:35 AM

4 posts on the same topic, none with any actual content, I might add, would probably be removed on any side of any issue. And you should have known that beforehand.

Don't be stupid.

i am deeply offended that you would resort to calling me stupid, john. i find that deeply disturbing and beneath you really. i would like that comment removed or that post removed. i'm shocked that such a personal attack has been allowed to last.

and all of those posts contained at least one line of content. i did not realize that there was a length requirement.

---

Updated On: 2/25/04 at 11:43 AM

I didn't say you *are* stupid, I said don't *be* stupid.

And your response is equally fake and intentionally agitating. Are you ever planning on having a real thought on any of this or do you just want to continue testing peoples' tolerance for your childish poking and prodding? Baiting people, if you will. Trolling, perhaps.

If you want to talk positively about the president: do it. Have thoughts. Write sentences. Start a topic.

Like an adult, even.

why bother to grow up when i can frolic in the playpen?

i do use full and complete sentences usually, i just have a problem with capitalization.

i think i'll stick with the poking, prodding, baiting, agitating and aggaravating (you forgot that one). however, the trolling image is nice too.

besides, i'm not going to change anybody's minds here about bush anymore than they'd convince me to vote for kerry. regardless of how many full and complete sentences i use. so i'll save my grown up tendencies for when i need them and continue here to splash in mud puddles.

and stop calling me stupid, monkey boy.

---

Updated On: 2/25/04 at 11:59 AM