Posted: 11/20/05 at 12:20pm
Posted: 11/20/05 at 12:22pm
It should have had ALL of the original Michael Bennett staging and choreography.
It should have had performers that could SING... and act, as well as dance.
They should have left the setting in 1975.
They should have kept us in the theatre, even if it began to feel claustrophobic (as many auditions do), and NOT try to open it up by cutting away to anything.
They should have hired a servicable director that "got the point" and not hand it to someone visionary. The vision is there already in the material and in the original staging.
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Updated On: 11/20/05 at 12:22 PM
Posted: 11/20/05 at 1:47pm
Updated On: 11/21/05 at 01:47 PM
Posted: 11/20/05 at 1:53pm
Posted: 11/20/05 at 2:04pm
Posted: 11/20/05 at 2:16pm
If that was his intent, to do it as a documentary (or faux-documentary), we would never have bought the words the auditioners say in the show as "real," if we knew all along they were just playing roles. Those stories would be lost and trivialized. Reduced to scripted lines on a page. Not to mention the cross-cutting would have pulled us out of the play's story every time. Just as it did in the Attenborough attempt.
However, Bennett was a visionary... He probably had more up his sleeve than that... and as you said, we'll never know what it might have been.
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Updated On: 11/20/05 at 02:16 PM
Posted: 11/20/05 at 2:46pm
Posted: 11/20/05 at 2:58pm
I think the closest we could get to the immediacy and impact of the stage show would be the live 3-5 film camera set-up, filmed very documentary style. No "bells and whistles."
However, that said, Bennett himself directed the Lincoln Center archival video tape of the OBC. He had a 3-5 camera set up for that (he insisted upon it), and he supervised the final editing as well. So, perhaps even THAT wasn't good enough or close enough to capturing the original for him.
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Posted: 11/20/05 at 3:48pm
Posted: 11/20/05 at 3:49pm
Couldnt you have just searched and bumped an old thread?
If in Heaven you don't excel, you can always party down in hell...
Posted: 11/20/05 at 4:11pm
Updated On: 11/21/05 at 04:11 PM
Posted: 11/20/05 at 4:14pm
Posted: 11/20/05 at 4:58pm
You're entitled to your opinion and I'm entitled to mine. Just because you hate someone I happen to like doesnt mean Im going to be offended, hurt and dismayed.
Im sure there's some performer, somewhere, that you like and I cannot stand.
In any event, for the record, I liked the movie. It's campy and horrible but so is the 'sequel' to Rocky Horror and I liked that as well.
And yes, I did see ACL on Broadway as a comparison.
If in Heaven you don't excel, you can always party down in hell...
Posted: 11/20/05 at 5:29pm
This is a "how would you make it better if you could" thread. Some people aren't reading the initial posting AT ALL before they start their predictable cracks.
A waste of time and energy.
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Posted: 11/20/05 at 5:49pm
WHy has the archival video never been released? Is the quality not good enough?
Posted: 11/20/05 at 5:55pm
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083067/
Posted: 11/20/05 at 5:58pm
Question 1) Yes, it's called "Shock Treatment." It's pretty dreadful. (Link with info below.)
Question 2) There have been several recent threads about this, but the Lincoln Center Archives are not for public use or commercial consumption. They are a way of preserving live theatre for educational & informational purposes only. And Michael Bennett's estate won't even let the Tony Award clips be released for the Broadway's Lost Treasures DVD series. It basically has to do with preserving the integrity of the show and its memory as intended by only seeing it in the theatre, etc. They would never allow the Chorus Line archival tape to be released. And even if they did, A Chorus Line is a unique show, in that all of its original participants receive royalties and residuals because of their involvement in the creation of the story and characters. Bennett set that up himself. It would be a costly nightmare trying to get a green light from everyone involved.
EDIT: Margo beat me to the link.
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Updated On: 11/20/05 at 05:58 PM
Posted: 11/20/05 at 6:04pm
Posted: 11/20/05 at 6:05pm
Posted: 11/20/05 at 6:10pm
Having heard so much about this landmark musical, the night i went the performers seemed like they did not want to be there, it was like crap we have to do this again.
For me the movie was everything i had hoped the stage version would be.
Posted: 11/20/05 at 6:12pm
It blew me completely away when I saw it, and I already knew every number in it.
You're so lucky!
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Posted: 11/20/05 at 6:55pm
Thanks again to all that posted. The rent movie jsut really got me curious about A chorus line and the similarities. Both movies came out some 10 years after original show, questionable director (for the peice), pulitzer, etc..
I have just always wondered what it was like to be a fan of grease and/or a chorus line and to hear about the movie and what was it like to then see the final product.
Updated On: 11/20/05 at 06:55 PM
Posted: 11/20/05 at 9:25pm
Alysson Reed was terribly miscast as Cassie and one of the biggest flaws in the movie was playing up Cassie and Zach's romance, thus making it a very integral part of the story. As you all know, a story of lost and found love was not the intenion Michael Bennett had.
The editing was also horrible.
Rosscoe, I'm sorry that you had a bad experience seeing it live.... It really was a magnificent show.
If in Heaven you don't excel, you can always party down in hell...
Posted: 11/21/05 at 12:36am
Also, the song changes-- "What I Did for Love" is and will always be Morales's song to me, and hearing Cassie sing it gave it a twist that didn't advance the plot or touch me the same way it does when Morales sings it. Taking away "Music and the Mirror", which is in every way Cassie's song, made it harder for me to understand her character-- sure, there are similarities between the two pieces, but they are very different and I believe that it's not only the song and the delivery but also the character that truly give a piece meaning.
My avatar: Yummy, no?
BroadwayWorld TV