My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!
Home For You Chat My Shows (beta) Register/Login Games Grosses
pixeltracker

An Open Letter to Broadway From Marlee Matlin- Page 2

An Open Letter to Broadway From Marlee Matlin

Phyllis Rogers Stone
#25An Open Letter to Broadway From Marlee Matlin
Posted: 1/14/16 at 12:19pm

Will this PC nonsense ever end?!  If people chose not to hear, then they should understand that Broadway caters to the hearing.  Jeesh!

jimmycurry01
#26An Open Letter to Broadway From Marlee Matlin
Posted: 1/14/16 at 2:39pm

I am totally in favor of supertitles for every show. I hardly think they would be distracting, I'm not sure how well that works for those sitting in orchestra level seating though. I think it would be very difficult for a single interpreter to sign an entire show, or even an act at a time, especially if it is a musical. Too often many things are being said or sung all at once by multiple characters. I think it would be rather difficult to keep up. In any case, I would like to see theatre to become as accessible as possible to as many different people as possible. With so many wonderful advances in technology, I hope to see better results in the future.

SmokeyLady Profile Photo
SmokeyLady
#27An Open Letter to Broadway From Marlee Matlin
Posted: 1/14/16 at 4:53pm

Great letter.

VintageSnarker
#28An Open Letter to Broadway From Marlee Matlin
Posted: 1/14/16 at 5:19pm

I am not in favor of any supertitles above the stage. I think those would be incredibly distracting. Something like what the Met does seems like a good idea, especially if it was something portable that could be added to the back of a seat as needed. I was at a performance of Sylvia where they had this machine to the side of the stage. It was mildly distracting but not too bad. I wonder how I would have felt if I'd been seeing the show for the first time/had it been a better or more engaging show. I feel like it was programmed with the script because it didn't always follow what the actors were saying. An interpreter doesn't seem very feasible/practical.

starcatchers Profile Photo
starcatchers
#29An Open Letter to Broadway From Marlee Matlin
Posted: 1/14/16 at 11:31pm

jimmycurry01 said: "I am totally in favor of supertitles for every show. I hardly think they would be distracting, I'm not sure how well that works for those sitting in orchestra level seating though. I think it would be very difficult for a single interpreter to sign an entire show, or even an act at a time, especially if it is a musical. Too often many things are being said or sung all at once by multiple characters. I think it would be rather difficult to keep up. In any case, I would like to see theatre to become as accessible as possible to as many different people as possible. With so many wonderful advances in technology, I hope to see better results in the future.

 

"

I've never seen a performance with one interpreter. There are usually 2-3. I don't think it would be feasible to pay interpreters to be at every performance, but I do think there should be more scheduled performances with interpreters. 


the artist formerly known as dancingthrulife04 Check out my Etsy shop: https://www.etsy.com/shop/dreamanddrift And please consider donating to my Ride to Remember, benefitting the Alzheimer's Association: http://act.alz.org/site/TR?fr_id=8200&pg=personal&px=6681234


Videos