Ah, in comparing Garland and Streisand (and no argument about one aspect of both: their indescribable voices), there are two differences that immediately spring to my mind.
1. To me, the moniker of "greatest all around entertainer" carries with it the charge of being a triple threat. While Garland was not primarily a dancer, she did dance. Hasn't it been written that she was the only partner Astaire ever had where you watched her instead of him, e.g. "Midnight Choo Choo" in EASTER PARADE? Another example of her skill is "The Portland Fancy" number with Gene Kelly in SUMMER STOCK.
As for Streisand, the only really "dance-y" thing I remember her doing is "Swan Lake" in FUNNY GIRL with Tommy Rall. And that number is so chopped up and edited in the final cut of the movie that it boggles the mind. Also, it was meant to be a parody, and it is. A hilarious parody.
Summarization: Streisand "moves well" (and even that's up for debate), while Garland, when challenged, could rise to the occasion.
2. Garland, to me, exuded warmth when she was in top form in both film and on stage. "Have Yourself...Christmas" in ST. LOUIS is a classic, as are scads of her other movie numbers. Streisand seems to be, for lack of a better word, a more "selfish" performer. Again, not to say she's awful, but the style is just different. In her early TV specials -- heck, even in her recent concerts -- I got the feeling that she was mainly performing for herself, and the audience just happened to be there. Garland, however, was always ALL about the audience.
End of diatribe. I enjoy them both immensely, but if it's "all around entertainer" we're talking about, Garland wins it hands down.
Updated On: 12/11/03 at 08:57 AM