the critics were maybe a little harsh but nothing they said was out of line or unjustified. you always can disagree, but then its only fair that a critic who presents the criteria and properly justifies his statements ought to be free to express his opinion. Peter Marks said at one point that it isn't their job to speak for the public, only to speak for themselves. The public can't even speak for the public most of the time.
Old-fashioned, stringent, one-sided, narrow-minded, all are reasonable terms to critique a critic. But trying to do so thru personal insults will only emphasize the difference between "educated analyst doing consistent work" and "pissy fan with pen-envy". So maybe it gets a little elitist or even snobbish at times. Let the critics have their high standards in their field, and they'll let us have things like free time and personal lives.
that said, I loved DESSA ROSE despite the glaring imperfections all mentioned already. It's easy to sit there and point out the cliches and imbalances, but I found it to be one show where I could get swept up in the emotion and music to the point where I lost my desire to find flaws. If I didn't like the score so much, I'd have much more to say about the problems in the show. But then I might have run the risk of being called ugly names, so thanks yet again Flaherty/Ahrens. I'm seeing it again Sunday and anticipate a fine time.
"The last train out of any station will not be full of nice guys."
- Dr. Hunter S. Thompson
"I wash my face, then drink beer, then I weep.
Say a prayer and induce insincere self-abuse,
till I'm fast asleep"- In Trousers