"HAIRSPRAY" playbill question

[Unknown User]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 3:13pm

On the playbill for "HAIRSPRAY", there is a picture of half of a girl's face with blue hair. Does anyone know if that is Marissa Jaret Winouker or someone else?

[broadwayguy2]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 3:14pm

marissa

[TheatreDiva90016]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 3:16pm

Yes, it's Marissa.

BWGUY, I thought we were going out? lol

[broadwayguy2]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 3:19pm

hahahahaha. nowhere to go TO. lol.

[maybethistime]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 5:39pm

i know the original was marissa j w, but i also know they took a similar picture of the replacment, so you could have either

[ShbrtAlley44]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 5:42pm

Speaking of which, was that Jane's picture in the "Nine" revival logo?

[broadwayguy2]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 5:43pm

all of the playbills and posters and ads.. everything.. are marissa.

[Addicted2Seaweed]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 5:54pm

I got this coffee table book with the libretto and notes from the writers and stuff. It said that the original cast (or at least Marissa) did photo shoots for Vogue and I think Elle. Does anyone know where I could find them?

[broadwayguy2]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 5:57pm

llok on marissa's website. she had just about EVERY photo spread on there last time i looked.

[little_sally]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 9:30pm

ShbrtAlley44, wasn't the Nine logo Sarah Gettelfinger (sp)?

[munkustrap178]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 11:14pm

No - it's not Sarah or Jane - I think it's just a random woman probably not even in the show. That logo existed long before the production was ever actually on stage.

[LittleBitRacist]

Posted: 12/8/04 at 7:00pm

Does anyone know WHY the girl on the cover has a white face and blue hair? If you do, PLEASE explain to me!

[ladywholunches24]

Posted: 12/8/04 at 7:03pm

i want to know that too! haha and i actually have been wondering about if that was indeed marissa...
________________________________________________________________
"yes but who wants diabeties?"

[Swiftynifty15]

Posted: 12/9/04 at 3:46pm

Why Did they have it look like that?

[broadwayguy2]

Posted: 12/9/04 at 3:53pm

well because they took the picture, altered the coloring and edited it to be just half the face because that is what they wanted the logo to be. I have seen the actual picture that the logo was made from and it would have been an AWFUL logo if left untouched. The logo has a graphic quality and a 'nameless' quality that the original doesn't. Using an untouched photo of Marissa as the logo for EVERY company and future company would have been a BAD idea.