
Well said, I agree 100%.
I know it's just a (very) vocal minority - but what gets to me are phrases like "pure unadulterated pretentious British crap", as if the fact that it's
British pure unadulterated pretentious crap makes it somehow worse.
I think the big difference between Broadway-attitude-to-West-End and West-End-attitude-to-Broadway here on BWW is that we West End bods tend to crave American product over here, whereas there's no such hunger for West End shows to transfer Stateside. Most of that's down to the embarrassing state of British-born musicals (even those based on American properties), but I think it's a factor in why our attitudes are different. I don't think that's true at all, actually. My guess is
The History Boys was a hit in New York (and, from what I can tell, a hit with BWW members!) precisely because Broadway doesn't tend to produce plays like that. The same reason that something like
Hairspray, which could never have originated in the UK, was a big hit over here. Something a bit different. But the fundamental reason that they succeeded is because they were good. If they hadn't been good, the "British" or "American" tag they came with would mean nothing. I think there's an interest in imports on both sides, but not to the extent where every Broadway musical in the West End and every West End play on Broadway is automatically a success. Which is a good thing, of course.
Updated On: 5/6/10 at 06:45 AM