"Before we turn this into a horrible tragedy, let's remember that she had a long, prestigious career that most people can only dream about. By the time of this surgery, she was getting to the point in life where she would have begun to lose range anyway as a natural part of the aging process. This didn't happen when she was 30 or 35."
You cannot be serious. Are you really trying to convince me (well, the board) that even if Ms. Andrews' voice was not damaged by surgery that her voice (and career) would have been lost anyway? There is a difference *losing* something to the aging process and having something so precious *taken* from you by because of a careless mistake by some doctor? That can be avoided. A good doctor should be very careful when treating a patient but you would think a doctor would use extra precaution while in performing surgery on Ms. Andrews voice. But that's just my opinion.
Seeing the huge amount of people that have read this thread, i've opened a new thread on this subject in order attempt to have a wider response because I know sometimes people read a thread once then never come back to it. So I would appreciate it if board members would care to take a second to read and respond..
(formerly bronte604)
"You really just love money and power and capitalism? You know they're never going to love you back."
"Things happen for the best...I don't even believe that myself."
Updated On: 1/31/05 at 12:19 AM