I had assumed that they had included Love Heals because they wanted that coveted "new song" award at the Oscars (or the Grammys....or whatever award show it is...there are way too many....as long as I have my Tonys, who needs the others? ^^
I, too, assumed that the song would be on the end credits. In fact, I made my friend sit with me through the end because she hadn't heard the song yet. Actually, she hadn't even known there WAS a "new song" (not really NEW, but you know...) until I said something.
I was sad that it didn't play because it was so pretty, but sitting around was worth it because I absolutely ADORED how they thanked Jonathan Larson at the end. That was worth everything. It's so tragic that he died.....he could have gone on to do so many great things in the world.....and now he'll never have the chance.
It makes sense what earlier posters have said about the song being too 'upbeat' at the end, but can that truly be the sole reason? Especially since it could be argued that the end brims with hope and promise?
If the song wasn't included in the movie at all, but is on the movie soundtrack and the DVD, can it still win for best song? I would rather have "Rent" win over "The Producers" any day, if only because "Rent" hits me on a deeper scale and has such an emotional impact. "The Producers"........well, it isn't my favorite musical in the world, though it is enjoyable. If "Rent" can't get the nom, I WOULD like to see another musical take home the prize!!
Anyway.....sorry for imposing myself on y'all once more tonight. I'll go back into my lurkdom now and trouble you no more. Honest!