This is not a really a case of "well, it's not Fosse, so why even go there?" but, rather the case of a choreographer who doesn't understand how to use dance to tell a story, flesh out character and add nuance and vibrancy to the overall production. It's just a bunch of steps with no motivation or urgency behind them, let alone wit or personality. If steps and movement are not tied to character, they ultimately only have a fraction of the impact that they could, no matter how well executed they are by a company of professional dancers. You don't HAVE to re-create Fosse's original choreography, but with a show like this one with a rather weak and superficial book you need to have a choreographer who knows how to use movement to add depth and meaning to the proceedings. Cilento doesn't know how to do that.
Look at Reinking's work on another Fosse masterpiece "Chicago." While the choreography was "in the style of" Fosse, the actual steps and movements were her own (with the exception of "Hot Honey Rag" which was Fosse's original) and she managed to capture the essence of the Fosse's wit and dynamism and vibrancy without resorting to pure imitation. Her dances had attitude and perspective and informed character -- precisely what's missing from Cilento's work on "Sweet Charity" which is all random and interchangeable and frankly, in the end, rather boring.
If you're still unclear as to what I'm referring to, do yourself a favor and rent or buy the film version of "Sweet Charity" directed and choreographed by Fosse himself. A picture's worth a thousand words -- watch the sheer genius at work in "Rich Man's Frug" and "There's Gotta Be Something Better Than This" and then maybe you'll understand what a complete and total botch job Cilento made of this show.
"What a story........ everything but the bloodhounds snappin' at her rear end." -- Birdie
[http://margochanning.broadwayworld.com/]
"The Devil Be Hittin' Me" -- Whitney
Updated On: 5/2/05 at 01:12 AM