#1
Posted: 11/13/09 at 9:12am
I was recently listening to the Violet cast album and thinking how much I loved Jeanne Tesori's work on it, and Caroline or Change. So I looked her up on wiki--and found out she had done songs for the pretty awful direct to DVD Disney films Mulan II, Little Mermaid III And Emperor's New Groove II. Now I haven't actually seen more than clips of these, and maybe her songs for them are brilliant--but it saddened me a bit to see her doing third rate Disney DVD sequels... I like her songs for Millie well enough, but nothing in Shrek makes me wanna hear more either.
Which got me thinking--how there are some composers (Sondheim is my obvious, probably too obvious, example) who do score after score that at the least has interest. Even Andrew Lloyd Webber, love or hate him, is pretty consistant when you really look at his work. But there are a lot of composers out there who have had a handful of absolute classic shows--and then a lot that no one except big fans would go out of their way for.
Some of my choices might be controversial--I think Jule Styne and Cy Coleman are both *fantastic* top tier composers. Yet I think each have a good handful of scores I wouldn't even bother having on CD, except to add to my collection. Kander and Ebb are responsible for four of my fave shows ever (Zorba, Chicago, Cabaret and Kiss of the Spider Woman). They also have a few other flop shows like the Rink that have worthy scores. And then IMHO they have a handful of shows I find only of slight interest.
There are other composers where maybe I need to give more of their work more of a chance but for instance Nine is the only score of Yeston that has really gone out and grabbed me, ditto Dreamgirls for Henry Krieger, and even really Chorus Line for Marvin Hamlisch (though I haven't heard Sweet Smell of Success yet).
Do others have examples of this--composers you absolutely ,love at least one of their scores, but you know better than to blindly buy new cast albums from them?
Which got me thinking--how there are some composers (Sondheim is my obvious, probably too obvious, example) who do score after score that at the least has interest. Even Andrew Lloyd Webber, love or hate him, is pretty consistant when you really look at his work. But there are a lot of composers out there who have had a handful of absolute classic shows--and then a lot that no one except big fans would go out of their way for.
Some of my choices might be controversial--I think Jule Styne and Cy Coleman are both *fantastic* top tier composers. Yet I think each have a good handful of scores I wouldn't even bother having on CD, except to add to my collection. Kander and Ebb are responsible for four of my fave shows ever (Zorba, Chicago, Cabaret and Kiss of the Spider Woman). They also have a few other flop shows like the Rink that have worthy scores. And then IMHO they have a handful of shows I find only of slight interest.
There are other composers where maybe I need to give more of their work more of a chance but for instance Nine is the only score of Yeston that has really gone out and grabbed me, ditto Dreamgirls for Henry Krieger, and even really Chorus Line for Marvin Hamlisch (though I haven't heard Sweet Smell of Success yet).
Do others have examples of this--composers you absolutely ,love at least one of their scores, but you know better than to blindly buy new cast albums from them?