Munk re-visits CHICAGO, DRS, and PRODUCERS — Page 2

I was one of those early "critics" who was fairly lukewarm about DRS. I found the book overly schtick-laden and clunky and too-exposition-heavy in Act I and that the show generally cribbed and out and out stole the few decent bits from better shows. I thought the whole Gettelfinger subplot could have been dropped (though she's very good). The score had its moments (but had several undistinguished spots) and O'Brien's staging was fluid-enough (though he's done much better work), but Mitchell's choreography at times felt liked warmed over LaCage an Never Gonna Dance leftovers. The performances were good for the most part (though Butz pushed too hard at times and I thought Gleason was miscast -- I cold never buy someone with such a sharp and intelligent persona being a gullable ditz). The show had its moments, but really needed a re-write. I haven't seen it again and don't plan to -- I was underwhelmed.

---

I really loved DRS. I wouldn't see it again.

---

I agree with your chicago review. The producers one too actually because I saw JTE as Max over the summer filling in for Brad and I'm still pissed I went to see Hunter and he was out too. My whole cast was basically understudies except the amazing Angie who I agree has limitless talent in that role. Great reviews

---

HUM, think i'll go to the store and rent the movie then i guess. heard it's good

Thanks, munk. I'll post my review after I return from my trip. I have nothing to compare it to, so maybe I'll find it fresh and funny. I hope so.

lc