It's good that they came with their own cocnept. Erm, but that's the thing...to me, it doesn't look like they did. It comes off as an attempt to emulate Bjornson and Prince (while throwing in movie ideas from Schumacher, Byrne, and Pratt) without the budget to really accomplish it all. It seems less like it was re-imagined for a low budget and more like existing ideas were thrown together and they saw what would stick with the money they had.
Again, that's not to belittle the efforts of this production's creative team. This is clearly an
extremely difficult show to pull off visually without a Broadway budget, and any school that tackles it without much precedent needs to be given due credit. The chandelier and (most) costumes, for example, look great. That said, though, this test licensing period
is meant to determine if and how low-budget productions of this show can work. It may not be entirely fair, but judging from the photos, I'm just not sure if this one does.
ETA: To be more specific, I think they should have gotten more creative with their scenic design. The all-purpose staircase doesn't really work the way it probably seemed like it would on paper. And I'll throw more praise at the costumes--some of them really look gorgeous. (Aside from the Phantom's costumes and Christine's dressing gown...because if you're going to imitate Bjornson's iconic designs you need to do it
exactly, otherwise you'll look like any of the myriad cheap imitations that have popped up at weddings and dinner theaters since the show became popular in the 80s.)
"If there is going to be a restoration fee, there should also be a Renaissance fee, a Middle Ages fee and a Dark Ages fee. Someone must have men in the back room making up names, euphemisms for profit."
(Emanuel Azenberg)
Updated On: 2/14/08 at 11:32 PM