Riedel: "Expect Company to open on Broadway 2006-2007"
re: Riedel: Expect Company to open on Broadway 2006-2007#75
Posted: 3/22/06 at 1:58pm
Singing, acting, dancing AND playing an instrument is excessive.
Not to mention the fact that it would probably look a little bit ridiculous.
Skittles, stop messing with my head. And my hormones.
Thanks. :-P
re: Riedel: Expect Company to open on Broadway 2006-2007#76
Posted: 3/22/06 at 2:12pm
Wanting life but never knowing how
re: Riedel: Expect Company to open on Broadway 2006-2007#77
Posted: 3/22/06 at 2:43pm
Just in case...
*takes guns, knives, and any other sharp objects or objects in general that can inflict pain on herself or others away from Emcee on the night of the 2007 Tonys*
re: Riedel: Expect Company to open on Broadway 2006-2007#78
Posted: 3/22/06 at 3:02pmNumber 2 was the London Sunday in the Park With George. I was incredibly lucky on that count.
re: Riedel: Expect Company to open on Broadway 2006-2007#79
Posted: 3/22/06 at 3:24pm"Tick-Tock" was actually cut from Company altogether although the Broadway revival did include it since Ms.Charlotte was playing the role of Kathy (interesting she played that role and now she is going to play another McKechnie role-Cassie). I believe for Doyle's production, Tick-Tock would complicate casting the role of Kathy and it probably wouldn't work within the concept. Also, I'm sure it saves money on hiring a choreographer (I wish they did though, I like "You Could Drive A Person Crazy" to be danced as well, and I hear it's not a dancing number in Doyle's staging). I'm sure there are many great aspects in this production to make up for the absence of some good dancing numbers.
re: Riedel: Expect Company to open on Broadway 2006-2007#80
Posted: 3/22/06 at 3:34pm
Oh, I've heard that that production is incredible, Plum.
Videos


