showbiz you are wrong on so many levels. yes i am a fan of rosario's but that's beside the point. i would have come to the defense of any other actress that would have been cast in this role if i felt she was right for the role REGARDLESS of the fact if she were a Broadway actress or not.
your opinions are not based on knowledge, they have no basis other than being a bad case of sour grapes on your part.
what argument do you *really* have that Rosario is not right for this part? That she hasn't done "BROADWAY"? That's hardly a valid point.
i've posted this before and I will post it again. If you live in the NYC area try to catch Rosario in "TWO GENTLEMEN OF VERONA", she's required to sing LIVE six performances a week and then come back and let us know if you think she can sing or not.
Why does it have to be about BROADWAY VS. MOVIE actors? ACTORS are ACTORS and this is an ACTING ROLE. That is the point many of you are not getting. If Rosario wasn't right for this role I would definitely agree with many of the things you are saying but I don't.
What you are saying is that it's a movie version of a Broadway show and that
only Broadway actors should have been cast. You have a very limited mind-set. What ever happened to choosing the right person for the role..period?
If every producer though that way look at all the wonderful performances we would have missed out on in movie versions of Broadway musicals. One that comes to mind is Rita Moreno in "West Side Story". She wasn't a Broadway name yet she was cast in the movie version of "West Side Story" and she won an Oscar for it. Would it have been nice to have seen Chita do the role on screen? Yes it would have, but that simply wasn't the case. But it also doesn't mean that Rita shouldn't have been given the opportunity to do the role either. Same goes for Rosario in "RENT".
EDIT: I am through with this debate. It's a done deal. It's a fact you guys are going to have to live with. There's nothing you can do about it but get over it.
Updated On: 8/17/05 at 11:27 AM