It seems like it has improved by leaps and bounds since Chicago (and Zaks?), but I can't see how this could be the best possible Addams musical. I feel much of the pandering, dated, pop-reference focused humor is a complete betrayal of the source material.
Isn't there enough humor to be mined from what Charles Addams created without having to make out-of-character cracks? Or, does this approach really just speak to the uninformed audiences of today that Broadway has to market to?
I don't understand the point of view of this show, and when I saw it it wasn't fun enough to make up for that.
I enjoyed what I heard of the cast recording the other day, and I think "When You're An Addams" is an attractive and superior opening number to "Clandango." Lippa could have done better elsewhere. He should have taken inspiration from Viennese operetta (harpsichords!), Kander and Ebb, and Italian film scores. How I wish K & E would have done this show on the heels of the Chicago revival.
And, malice, it too is hard for me to reconcile why Addams isn't nominated for best musical when it is one of two original book scores this season and is just as (in)competent as past non-deserving nominees. Lippa's score is mediocre but it has some flashes of theatricality and serves many of the singers well. The score plays way better on disc than in the theater.
With Irma you gotta do something!
Updated On: 6/13/10 at 02:23 PM