Skip to main content
My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!
#1

The Art of the Revival

It's easier said than done... the "South Pacific" thread (where many pined for a revival) has brought me to the conclusion that more Broadway revivals need to be conceived with a purpose. Obviously shows are revived to recapture the original and recreate for new generations. But I don't understand reviving "Oklahoma!", "The Music Man", "Annie", "A Chorus Line" etc. on Broadway without someone's passion to give it a new twist. Productions of such shows are produced everyday in mediocre regional theatre companies. A while back, the idea of an all-African American cast of "Annie" was discussed, and many scoffed. But why not? How many films do we have of the traditional "Annie"? And recordings? And although Rebecca Luker is one of my favorite sopranos, how lifeless were the productions of "The Sound of Music" and "The Music Man" (if not attempts at being 50-year-old carbon copies?)

Let's see more revivals a la Doyle (and no, I don't mean instrumentalist-actors) What if "South Pacific" could somehow be restaged through the eyes of Luther Billis? Or even the island natives? Something that doesn't scream the Mary Martin or Mitzi Gaynor of 2006...

That said, anyone have radical ideas or seen productions with completely different takes on classic shows?
And at times I think I would gladly die For a day of sky
#2

re: The Art of the Revival

While I agree with you about giving revivals a new twist - I can't see why we need a revival of Chorus Line that's going to have the exact same score, book, and look - I don't agree about the "black" Annie. I don't really agree with any show that's "all black" for shock value. I would think that we - as a culture - have moved on from that. I mean, I can see like "glass menagerie" as all black just because they're families, but an "all black" annie? No. that's stupid.
#3

re: The Art of the Revival

I absolutely loved the idea behind a regional production of "Annie" a few years back where, in the end, Annie wakes up and it was all a dream, but I think this ended up somehow being a violation of copyright law.
#4

re: The Art of the Revival

I suppose there is a very fine line of what are acceptable changes to a show, but couldn't there be implications of certain things (such as Annie's waking from a dream) -- not implicit changes to the script that would still be allowed? That is more the idea I was going for, no new scenes or songs, but perhaps new ideas through staging or casting. I saw a female in the role of the Emcee in "Cabaret" which was fabulous.
And at times I think I would gladly die For a day of sky
#5

re: The Art of the Revival

I totally agree with RentBoy about the doing all black casts for shock value. Too many times I have seen that, and it is just for the shock value of the show. It doesn't really add any new layers to the show.

And as for A Chorus Line, I think it's a we bit too soon to be doing a revival of the show. The same thing with Into The Woods, and 42nd Street, you have to allow people to kind of forget about the show for a while, and then you bring it back to a new audience. Not bringing the show back to the same audience.
http://theaterfag.blogspot.com/ Reviews and the like
#6

re: The Art of the Revival

How would casting ANNIE with an entirely black cast make it all that different?
"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy." -Charlie Manson
#7

re: The Art of the Revival

Using an all black cast for Annie wouldn't do anything, it would still be the same show but with a black cast, now if they set it in the 80's and changed "We'd Like To Thank You Herbert Hoover" into a coke induced hallucination revolving around Ronald Reagan, we'd have something.
http://theaterfag.blogspot.com/ Reviews and the like
#8

re: The Art of the Revival

How about a black version of THE SOUND OF MUSIC!

Seriously I guess for any revival to succeed it has to appear "fresh" and that has as much to do with design as performance. I too can't really see the sense of doing A CHORUS LINE exactly as it was done in 1976 unless it is just to show us how it was in 1976 for some historical reason.
#9

re: The Art of the Revival

These discussions always tire me a little. No good director of classical theater ever looks at HAMLET or CHERRY ORCHARD or DOLL's HOUSE and says, "What new twist can I put on this piece to make it fresh?" The question is, rightly, "What is the essential truth of this play that makes its production necessary for audiences now?" (There is a reason why JULIUS CAESAR gets produced around election cycles.)

Of course, these productions are usually staged at nonprofit theatres where the answer to all questions isn't just "to make money." Broadway is a different beast. Product (and that is the correct word) is supposed to turn a profit for its investors.

The reason to "set" A CHORUS LINE in 1976 is because its cultural references sit best there. Does it need to be a complete recreation of the Bennett original? Perhaps not (though the original was bloody brilliant), as long as new staging gets at that "essential" truth as perfectly as Mr. Bennett did.
#10

re: The Art of the Revival

The topic makes me think of some of the changes made in the current revival of Pajama Game. The script has been rewritten somewhat--the plot is not changed, but one major change in the script is that Babe is much more sexually open then in the original. In the original the Babe-Sid scenes are "hot" but he is always the one coming on strong. In the revival at Roundabout, prior to Once a Year Day, Babe says something to the effect that she has had the hots for Sid since she first saw him in the factory. Wouold a woman have said that in 1954? It didn't diminish the enjoyment of the revival for me, but it certainly was a stark contrast to the original.
Another difference is that Gladys, as created by Carol Haney was a young hoyden, flirtatious and friendly to all men.The Roundabout's Gladys seems more frumpy, a close relative to Guys and Dolls' Miss Adelaide, and certainly older. Maybe this was to justify her relationship with Hines. I found myself not liking this version of Gladys that much, it was too limited for me, though I certainly admired Megan Lawrence's committment to it.
Maybe Kathleen Marshall, whom I assume was responsable for the changes, wanted to make Babe the sexual center of the piece, with no rivals. If this was her idea, she definitely succeeded.

There are one or two other quirky changes that I noticed as well, but I would be interested to hear from other posters whether they noticed these changes and if it effected them.
#11

re: The Art of the Revival

Ronnie Howard was talking about the need to reframe a popular work in such a manner than even those most-familiar with it would still find something new and stimulating in the execution of the story telling.

ANY work, given someone adapting it or reintrepting it with an agile mind, can be looked at through a new lens.

As an example, Lincoln Center's 50th Anniversary of "Our Town" picked up, as did "Winesburg, Ohio, on the seemier side of life in anotherwise storybook town.

Steppenwolf's "Grapes of Wrath", through staging, incidental music, and by incorporating scenes that couldn't make it past the censors during its time came up with somethng completely fresh.

Unsofar as "A Chorus Line" goes, there may have been scenes, songs, and dialogue left on the floor in the 70's that could be put back in the show again.

That's the beauty of adaptation.
#12

re: The Art of the Revival

With Pajama Game, I think since Marshall had decided to "split" the role of Gladys into singing and dancing components giving all the really fancy dancing to a dancer. (ok except Hernando's Hideaway but that is an ensemble piece)it only made sense to give ths singing roles to a more mature actress for the reason you mentioned- the relationship w Hinsey seems more loving, not just an old goat w a young kid. Marshall et all really enhanced the 2ndary couple which was ok but not an improvement.
#13

re: The Art of the Revival

This is in response to the all-black ANNIE, didn't Pearl Bailey play Dolly Levy in an all-black production of HELLO, DOLLY!? And it was 1960-something. From what I've heard, it was well-reviewed, but I got the feeling that it was stunt casting nonetheless. To be honest, I can't really see an all-black cast of ANNIE. Maybe if someone did their own version (or even a parody) a la THE WIZ and possibly call it ANNEKA or something.
Salve, Regina, Mater misericordiae
Vita, dulcedo, et spes nostra
Salve, Salve Regina
Ad te clamamus exsules filii Eva
Ad te suspiramus, gementes et flentes
O clemens O pia
#14

re: The Art of the Revival

Yeah they did do an all black production of Hello Dolly during the 60's. I think it was more of an attempt to infuse some life back into the show. It was in 1967, and they just replaced all of the white cast members with black cast members. So it wasn't really a revival, it was more stunt casting.
http://theaterfag.blogspot.com/ Reviews and the like

BroadwayWorld TV


Ticket Central
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $95
Hot Show
Tickets From $143
Hot Show
Tickets From $102