I hesitate, but it seems that you (matt) think that just because a show may be limited on set design, all that is offered is seen in the first few minutes. I was speaking specifically with regards to the staging. Blocks go up and down with projections shown on them. There are a couple of other set pieces that come in, but when it came to the core concept of the technological design and the staging, it revealed very little after the first few scenes and nothing that was any more interesting than before. I've seen shows with far little do FAR more (Falsettos immediately springs to mind). It was clear this production was all about the technology, but the creativity was lacking.
to me they were, to borrow a phrase, tasteful and organic to the plot Se for me, it was completely inorganic. It was like a slideshow on flat surfaces, lacking in depth and texture. Jane Eyre, on the other hand, was a masterpiece in using projections organically to combine concept with narrative. That was truly stunning. Hunchback just looked like an experiment.
I wish Disney would leave Broadway to Broadway What I like about Broadway is that it is open to any producer who can raise the money to put a production on Broadway. Be it Disney, Dodger Theatricals, the Weisslers, Lincoln Center, Roundabout or Ken Davenport. It shouldn't make any difference. And Disney has proved that they can generate a flop just like any other producer in the business.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian