My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!
pixeltracker

serious musicals vs. fluff.....

serious musicals vs. fluff.....

children&art Profile Photo
children&art
#0serious musicals vs. fluff.....
Posted: 12/20/05 at 10:04am

Why is it that "serious" musicals seem to always lose out to big, splashy fluff musicals for the Tony? Is it really just about commercialism and not about art (if so, I am disheartened)?

2005: Light in the Piazza lost to Spamalot
2004: Caroline or Change lost to Avenue Q
2000: James Joyce's The Dead lost to Contact (both great shows, so not a big loss in my opinion)
1999: Parade lost to Fosse (c'mon, what was the deal???)
1998: Ragtime lost to The Lion King
1994: Passion beat Beauty and the Beast (YEAH! VICTORY!)
1992: Falsettos lost to Crazy for You
1991: Miss Saigon & The Secret Garden lost to The Will Rogers Follies
1984: Sunday in the Park... lost to La Cage (I STILL DO NOT UNDERSTAND THIS, AT ALL!)


Don't f*ck with me fellas. This ain't my first time at the rodeo.

best12bars Profile Photo
best12bars
#1re: serious musicals vs. fluff.....
Posted: 12/20/05 at 10:15am

Fluff (which is probably too strong a word)... let's say "light-hearted entertainment"... usually appeals to a wider audience (including voters) than a "serious" piece does.

It's the same thing with the Oscars... big spectacles usually win, with only a handful of movies like "Midnight Cowboy" or "Million Dollar Baby" taking the prize. More often it's "Titanic" or "Ben-Hur" or "Lord of the Rings."

There are exceptions too the Tony wins too: Nine beating out Dreamgirls comes to mind. The "big" show lost that year to a more cerebral, less audience-friendly piece. But generally, the winner is...

Big and splashy.


"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22

hen88
#2re: serious musicals vs. fluff.....
Posted: 12/20/05 at 10:19am

I think the touring factor is a big one. The Tony's are not necessarily always about quality. What's monetarily lucrative always hightens a show's possibilities of winning awards. It's a delicate balancing act. Of course, the Tony's don't want to award a show that was universally panned by the critics, so they usually latch on to shows that are big and make lots of money, are tourable and also have the thumbs-up from the critics. Unfortunately, big splashy comedies are the ones that have been making waves lately. Anything too challenging or innovative is usually a hard sell on the road. The only times a "serious" or "innovative" musical wins awards is when there are slim pickings. Passion was one of those cases where it won only because Beauty & the Beast was its only competition, and the Tony's essentially snubed Disney that year for trying to bring what was seen as an amusement park spectacle to Broadway. It's all just politics in the end. It's kind of unfortunate.

best12bars Profile Photo
best12bars
#3re: serious musicals vs. fluff.....
Posted: 12/20/05 at 10:26am

"It's all just politics in the end. It's kind of unfortunate." ---hen88

That pretty much sums it up. As much as I LOVE the Tonys and the Oscars... When it comes to a Best Musical, Best Picture, etc., you have to know that it's only a collective opinion. It isn't a "fact" that it's the best.

It's only a "fact" that it won.


"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22

hen88
#4re: serious musicals vs. fluff.....
Posted: 12/20/05 at 10:34am

Exactly...

BwayBaby18 Profile Photo
BwayBaby18
#5re: serious musicals vs. fluff.....
Posted: 12/20/05 at 11:31am

Um in 2000 The Wild Party was totally screwed and that is NOT fluff

littleredridinghood Profile Photo
littleredridinghood
#6re: serious musicals vs. fluff.....
Posted: 12/20/05 at 12:13pm

Avenue Q is probably not as serious as Caroline or Change, but at least it didn't lose to Wicked or Boy from Oz...

bythesword84 Profile Photo
bythesword84
#7re: serious musicals vs. fluff.....
Posted: 12/20/05 at 12:20pm

Hey I'd take anything over Caroline or Change. Regardless of the fact that I'm an Avenue Q fan, there was no way that CoC had a remote shot at winning in my opinion. Not when it had Wicked, Q, and The Hugh Jackman mobile against it. Then again, I'd pick 99.9% of shows over CoC anyway.


And hang on, when did you win the discus?

jasobres
#8re: serious musicals vs. fluff.....
Posted: 12/20/05 at 12:33pm

I'd say everyone is entitled to their own opinion. End of story.


"Ev'ry-buddy wants ta get into de act!" - Jimmy Durante "Breathe from your hoo-hoo." -Kristin Chenoweth

apdarcey
#9re: serious musicals vs. fluff.....
Posted: 12/20/05 at 12:47pm

best play is usually a lot more "correct" for lack of a better word.

best12bars Profile Photo
best12bars
#10re: serious musicals vs. fluff.....
Posted: 12/20/05 at 1:01pm

apdarcey --- That's a good point (but I'm sure everyone could raise exceptions)...

With plays there are not as many elements to consider with the overall production.

With musicals, you can have a show with 4 characters and a blank stage competing agains 60 dancers with a dozen major set changes. You can have a show that has only two pianos in the pit competing against a musical with 35 people dazzling you with complex orchestrations. There is a lot more that factors into "best" in people's minds with a musical than there is with a play.

(Plays can vary too, but not nearly as widely as musicals.)


"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22


Videos