Broadway Legend Joined: 6/30/05
I, personally, am probably better off with film. I'm really fascinated by how much of film acting is purely in the eyes.
Theatre, because that's what I'm trained in and where I want to be. However I do have subtle moments in my acting that can't really be seen onstage, but is picked up on film.
I'm afraid I might be better with film, but I would love to be better on stage.
Broadway Legend Joined: 3/12/05
I could try both, but I'm better with theatre, my energy is more built for the stage.
My features are all very pronounced, so my expressions are often large and good for theatre, where, if my face were on a 20 foot movie screen, it would probably frighten most movie-goers.
Broadway Legend Joined: 6/30/05
Film definitely. I favor the more subtle, realistic style. Although stylized hyper-real acting is koo as well.
Featured Actor Joined: 2/19/08
for me its weird. i don't get an ounce of stage fright when it comes to acting. I LOVE that feeling of being in front of people.
I realized that a lot of the facial expressions i do on stage might not be noticible unless i was doing film acting, so i decided to try it.
the second i got in front of a camera i stiffened. it was horrible, i was soo awkward and the acting looked awkward.
Broadway Legend Joined: 6/20/06
I've been told I'd be great for film, cause I can do very well at the subtle reactions and acting.
But I'm a performer, I love the high energy of being onstage and performing.
I'd say both.
I do best on stage. I've done quite a bit of film work, and while I enjoy it, I get criticized because "my eyes are too big" haha.
I've been trained/am training in acting for the stage. But I honestly think that if I would ever "make it" it would be in film, not the stage. I've been told that I need to be "bigger" onstage but it just feels a bit unnatural to me. I'm much more subtle than a stage actor should be which is a shame because I love the theatre but I also would love to do film too. Ideally I want to do both well! haha
Videos