#1
Posted: 9/29/08 at 12:00am
Scientific American has a 60 Second Science piece on the differing views of Barack Obama and Gimpy/Possible President Palin.
The CEO of a consortium of Nobel Lauriets and Business Leaders says of Barack Obama's responses: "The responses are more detailed and substantive than anything we've seen from an endorsed presidential candidate before the election..."
Clear-headed views of science and a lack of desire to regress to know-nothing flat earth "faith" pretty much calls this for Barack Obama.
Where Do They Stand?
The CEO of a consortium of Nobel Lauriets and Business Leaders says of Barack Obama's responses: "The responses are more detailed and substantive than anything we've seen from an endorsed presidential candidate before the election..."
Clear-headed views of science and a lack of desire to regress to know-nothing flat earth "faith" pretty much calls this for Barack Obama.
Where Do They Stand?
Twitter @NamoInExile
Instagram none
