Leaving aside the multi-level platinum surface idiocy of Carson's statement, it's important to look at the dangerous underpinnnings of his rationale.
He's maintaining that "choice" is the gravamen of a basis for unlawful discrimination.
If that's the case, then he would necessarily advocate denying equal protection claims based on religious discrimination.
After all, religion is something the great majority of people certainly have, in his own words, "control" over.
Looking beyond this, let's say people had easy cheap means to transition race, would he demand that they did so in order to fit in with the majority and be completely franchised?
Asshole.
Updated On: 3/5/15 at 11:35 AM