I don't know if the RIAA position is going to be challenged in court. I would think that if they try to enforce their interpretation it would be. Or, someone like EFF would challenge the position.
The Betamax decision:
"The Supreme Court's ruling in Sony v. Universal Studios (aka the Betamax case) is a landmark copyright precedent that has sheltered a wide array of technology innovators from lawsuits at the hands of the entertainment industries. In 1984, the Court held that a company -- in this instance, a VCR manufacturer -- was not liable for creating a technology that some customers may use for copyright infringing purposes, so long as the technology is capable of substantial non-infringing uses. In other words, where a technology has many uses, the public cannot be denied the lawful uses just because some (or many or most) may use the product to infringe copyrights."
Also, the fair use exemption under the copyright act has provided exceptions from violations for personal use. There are some ambiguities in the digital age on interpreting the exception, but I think that most people believe that ripping a CD that you own onto an iPod that you own is fair use, since this is the way you will be listening to the music purchased.
And, DG - that was what I thinking - what happens if someone has porn or some other questionable material on their MP3 player? Does this then give Customs the right to inform the government of the content?
Betamax
Updated On: 6/8/08 at 10:11 AM