Dick Clark
#25re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/1/06 at 10:51pmJust as an aside, CE, that's the most interesting cat picture I have ever seen!
#26re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/1/06 at 11:03pmHis physical presence may be changed, but his heart is still in place. Hats off to Dick Clark.
ghostlight2
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/5/04
#27re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/1/06 at 11:17pm
I'm certainly not a fan of his, but some of what I'm reading here is outrageously harsh. Never thought I'd find myself agreeing with SamIam, but c'mon people! Poor bastard had a stroke and soldiered on.
Also, FWIW, Mr Clark had no trouble at all planting a very serious liplock on the lady next to him at midnight. He's definately not dead yet.
#28re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/1/06 at 11:23pm
Thank you, Jane... tis my snarky cat, Kyrnan.
#30re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 12:19pm
Your stupidity and frivolity never cease to amaze me. Talk about a hypocrit: if you read your entire post, you would remember writing,
"I thought Roxy's assessment was particularly cruel."
As a matter of fact, NimingFagmo, Roxy's assessment was particularly accurate.
So shove it.
FindingNamo
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
#31re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 12:22pm
10 points for fag-baiting, but unfortunately, you lose them for calling me stupid in the same post you misspell "hypocrite."
Thanks for playing, though. Please try again.
#32re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 12:30pm
Yeah those typos really say a lot about a person huh? At least you've never made one....(we'll forget about your spelling of apropos as "approppo" a little while back).
Needless to say, you have no humility and cannot admit your folly. I wish I could quit chew Namo. Alas, I feel it is my duty to continue to put you in line and prove you wrong. Which is oh so easy to do.
Happy New Year. Let's hope you come to your senses some time between now and December 31st.
FindingNamo
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
#33re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 12:48pmTypos are fine. EXCEPT in a post where you're calling somebody else stupid. Every heard of a dictionary? They can be enormously helpful for someone of your limited abilities.
#34re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 1:01pm
You are a hypocrite. Why, you ask? You clearly don't understand what a typo is. Maybe you should get a dictionary yourself and look it up, as you will see that a typo is a mistake and does not stem from a lack of knowledge. My attainment of a dictionary would be pointless.
So, you are quite stupid actually. And I am sure that if you post in response to this comment, I will find more inaccuracies and instances of hypocrisy. You just keep digging yourself a deeper hole. Thanks for the laughs.
FindingNamo
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
#35re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 1:04pm
"My attainment of a dictionary would be pointless."
Clearly.
#36re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 1:08pm
You are great at picking up tongue-in-cheek humor. Just fantastic.
As long as we are going to play this game:
"heard of a dictionary? They can be enormously..."
A dictionary might explain that "a" dictionary is singular. "It" can be enourmously helpful.
Anything else? I've got LOTS of material if you want to continue. Endless possibilities with the Fagmo.
etoile
Broadway Legend Joined: 8/2/03
#37re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 1:09pm
"...I feel it is my duty to continue to put you in line and prove you wrong."
442, your duty??? Did I miss that sign-up list?
Actually I believe it's your duty to not to repeat behavior that has gotten you banned in the past.
#39re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 1:12pmIt is your duty, etoile, to not spread rumors. I have not been banned.
etoile
Broadway Legend Joined: 8/2/03
#40re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 1:16pmI deal with facts! Those here who know me also know that!
#41re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 1:30pm
By definition, a fact is a truth. Me being banned has never been and will never be a truth. Therefore, you have no facts.
Nice try.
FindingNamo
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
#42re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 1:50pm
"It" can be enourmously helpful.
Not to mention "enormously." Golly, you sure have more than your share of "typos," statistically speaking, I mean.
etoile
Broadway Legend Joined: 8/2/03
#43re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 2:00pm
A suspension from posting is the same as being banned. In fact, just having post deleted is technically being banned, since it is an official prohibiting of an action.
Why don't you just stop posting again for 30 days? Perhaps this time you'll find your happy place.
#44re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 2:02pm
TO NEMO:
Ha! The stupidity just keeps coming!
Perhaps you [selectively] overlooked this sarcasm from a recent post of mine:
"You are great at picking up tongue-in-cheek humor. Just fantastic."
I guess I should not have assumed! Clearly you are clueless. That's okay though--what else would I have to post about on a Monday afternoon!?
Updated On: 1/2/06 at 02:02 PM
FindingNamo
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
#45re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 2:08pm
My point is that you just have to be extra careful with your "typos" in a thread in which you've criticized somebody else for being stupid. And let's face it, you spell enough words wrong for it to be more than just typographical error.
As for the rest of the drama you're creating in this thread, the discussion of your previous bannings remind me of the (to use your word) stupid high school kids who argued, "I wasn't expelled I was just suspended."
In any event, your 30-day suspension was a delight for the rest of us.
#46re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 2:13pm
Good God!
Proving you wrong and pointing out your stupidity (and incessant need of a dictionary) is too easy.
"I wasn't expelled I was just suspended."
"Suspended" and "expelled" are two completely different concepts.
You, my friend, are wrong again. Keep it coming. I've got all day.
FindingNamo
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
#47re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 2:15pm
All I'm saying is the 30 days in which you were not allowed to post here were lovely, and I among many am looking forward to the next time that happens!
#48re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 2:19pm
I am quite curious regarding this 30 day "suspension" of mine...since it never happened. If I have not posted on these boards it has been due to personal reasons or because of my absence from my computer.
And just because you have selectively disregarded specific information in my posts that slam your comments doesn't mean anyone else has too. Take a look at one (of the many) PM's I have received:
"Namo would not be NAMO if he did not whine...Thankfully, I finally decided to block him & a painful thorn in my side was removed"
So if you think I am alone.....as the saying goes...You are SO wrong.
#49re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 2:22pm
Crystal... Alexis... you're BOTH pretty.
Now, back in your corners.
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
FindingNamo
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
#50re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 2:23pm
You're coming across as SO GarySilverman/Mary_F_Ethel right now, you should really take another time out. Really, the "I've received countless PMs" tactic is so dullardly. Everybody gets PMs, the important part is getting them from the right people.
You were suspended for 30 days before and everybody knows it. Why are you so ashamed of that fact? A wannabe rebel like you should be proud of that fact.
#51re: Dick Clark
Posted: 1/2/06 at 2:26pm
It is quite possible that I have been suspended (God knows you have). However, if I have indeed been suspended (which is differnent from being expelled--you clearly have no knowledge regarding the difference...so funny) I was not at my computer. That is, any time I have logged on and posted here, I have done so with no problem. My posts appear as I wish them to appear, and always have.
So this "suspension" you speak of is completely foreign to me.
Videos




