I hate to sound like an idiot, but I'm confused the more articles I look up on this. Is the Obama administration wanting to go back on the decision to repeal DADT (which doesn't make any sense to me that they'd do an about-face like that) or are they just basically wanting to stick to the plan of a gradual implementation of the rescind in the military (what it sounds like to me) while the 9th Circuit Court is saying no, this needs to happen immediately?
It sounds like they're wanting the same thing, just one a little later and the other a lot sooner. Am I even half way understanding any of this??
If I am....not sure I have the wisdom to know which way is best. In a perfect USA, then yes, gays should be allowed to serve openly in the military and it should have been that way since forever. But since it's not a perfect country (God bless it), maybe there is good cause to lift the ban in a bit more gradual manner? I mean I don't know. I'm asking.
Updated On: 7/15/11 at 07:50 PM