Executive Order to Roll Back Obama's Federal Protections for LGBT Employees in the Works — Page 2

mar6411 said "Theatre Nerd, while I have nothing but the deepest of contempt for Trump and his ilk, I think your rhetoric does you a disservice."

What I posted was not rhetoric, there is not one thing that I wrote in my post that is not true.

His actions speak for themselves.

There is just no way of disputing that. And to call it anything else than what it truly is says a lot to me about the people disputing it and in turn defending him.

His supporters are with him all because everything he has done up until now does not affect them.

Bravo to newintown and adamgreer.

Ok fine, I won't call him an idiot or a moron.

I will! I'll also call him a sexist, egotistical, lying hypocritical bigot. And BroadwayConcierge riding the high horse of moral superiority is equally hypocritical, so there is no reason whatsoever to appease him in any way.

I'm equally curious to see if anybody can hold a healthy discussion about the merits of Trump's presidency—which I maintain has not been hateful in the slightest—without using asinine terms like "repugnant," "stupid," "idiot," and "moron."

I certainly don't care about your curiosity. And why hold us to a higher standard when describing Captain Creamsicle than you would demand of the Captain himself? Any time that thing holding office is the subject of discussion, a "healthy discussion" cannot be achieved because the man himself is poisonous and toxic to our country, its citizens and our allies.

Many of his supporters have never met a Muslim. Have never had them as neighbors, have never had them as classmates or as classmates for their kids. They view them as outsiders much as the WASPs did about the Irish, the Irish did about the Italians, the Italians did about the eastern Europeans, etc etc.

That's a wildly false comparison. I'm sorry, but in this day and age where media and information is available 24/7 at the fingertips of nearly the entirety of the country, I'm hard-pressed to give willful ignorance of American adults a pass. The people who choose religious bigotry and racism based on stereotypical generalizations also choose not to investigate even the simplest facts or statistics on the subject. Most of these are the same people demanding the right to discriminate the LGBT community and claim they are victims of religious discrimination themselves. I will not offer nor accept an excuse for this sort of behavior.

Right on Mar and MadBrian, the worst way to try and change peoples minds is to call them names, say they are dumb or being lectured by some pampered celebrity.

Oh, please. Your lot ELECTED A PAMPERED CELEBRITY who has ALWAYS called people names and much much worse. You think conservatives would consider themselves being "lectured to" by the likes of Jon Voigt, Kanye West, Mike Tyson, Dennis Rodman, Wayne Newton, Mike Ditka, Antonio Sabato Jr, Kelsey Grammer, Jerry Lewis, etc. should they voice support for Trump? Of course not.

Depending on who you listen to, Trump voters are either adults with real pains and concerns that need to be taken seriously or children who just didn't know better. Do I think it's possible for someone to regret their vote now? Of course. But he is behaving just as he did on the campaign trail- anyone who was paying attention even a little bit knew exactly what they were getting.

Petralicious said: "adamgreer said: "http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/brody_levesque/exclusive_sources_possible_executive_order_to_roll_back_obama_s_federal_protections_for_lgbt_employees_in_the_works

But I thought we needed to "give him a chance"? I thought he would be "good for the gays"?

I wonder if Broadway Concierge or Petra will attempt to defend this, or will they finally admit he's a homophobic bigot, like we've been saying all along.



Adam, looks like your source was Liberal FakeNews

President Trump on Tuesday declared that an executive order signed by the previous administration protecting LGBTQ employees on federal contracts from discrimination would remain unchanged.

“President Donald J. Trump is determined to protect the rights of all Americans, including the LGBTQ community. President Trump continues to be respectful and supportive of LGBTQ rights, just as he was throughout the election,” White House press secretary Sean Spicer said in a Tuesday morning statement.

“The president is proud to have been the first ever GOP nominee to mention the LGBTQ community in his nomination acceptance speech, pledging then to protect the community from violence and oppression,” the press secretary added.

“The executive order signed in 2014, which protects employees from anti-LGBTQ workplace discrimination while working for federal contractors, will remain intact at the direction of President Donald J. Trump,” Spicer concluded.

The statement comes a day after rumors began to swirl that Trump would sign an executive order overturning the LGBTQ policy. Asked about the rumor Monday, a White House official said, “That isn’t the plan at this time.”

But with Spicer’s statement Tuesday, the White House is taking a firmer stand that it not only will keep President Obama’s executive order on the books, but will enforce it.



"http://nypost.com/2017/01/31/trump-vows-to-enforce-order-protecting-lgbtq-employees/?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=NYPFacebook&utm_medium=SocialFlow&sr_share=facebook



Not FakeNews. Try to keep up. This was reported by BOTH the Washington Post and CNN, neither of which is "fake news" to anyone but the Alternative Facts Trumpers. And I maintain this is just a smokescreen for when he rolls out FADA, which will accomplish the same things the order wanted to, but will enshrine it into law, making it harder to undo.

Petralicious said: "adamgreer said: This was reported by BOTH the Washington Post and CNN,



"2 well known liberal lapdogs



Oh lord. Thank you for proving my earlier point about people willing to completely ignore verifiable facts and instead claim the media "lied" and "dishonest."

You know you've f**cked up when Liza's Headband - one of the top three most despicable posters on the board - agrees with you. And the last thing I want to do is have Mister Matt - one of my favorite posters - think I'm an idiot (although I may be).

I hate everything about Trump and his minions. But I struggle with the reality that a lot of people voted for him and support him. I don't mean to defend those voters, I'm just trying to understand and I don't think it is possible to assume them away. And I know they own their choices.

I will leave with my tail between my legs in humiliation. :)

Petralicious said: "Do not the liberals do this as well? with anything reported by Fox as being automatically disqualified in their eyes? I will backtrack on CNN, i dont think very biased, but horrible. Look at this endorsement list from WASHPOST. You may say they are not biased, but they are almost all liberal endorsements."



No. The liberals do not "do this as well". There have been times Fox News has reported things fairly - - - although for the most part they were hell bent in criticizing President Obama every chance they got.

The Washington Post may have endorsed almost all - - - liberal candidates but I am sure that whether the elected President was either a Republican or a Democrat that it would not oppose that President if that President was exercising his or her power for the good of the country and it's citizens.

But we're taking about Trump here, so if anything that he has done in the past week and a half has not even raised one bit of concern to you and this country then to me that is just extremely disturbing to me.

I would really love to sit here and debate this all day long with you but I really have to get back to work.

Updated On: 1/31/17 at 11:51 AM

And the last thing I want to do is have Mister Matt - one of my favorite posters - think I'm an idiot (although I may be).

I don't think you're an idiot at all. I know where you're coming from and what you were trying to say and I don't fault you for the intent. I personally have just been pushed to a point of lesser forgiveness or compassion for those responsible for this mess. I felt like you were missing a crucial factor from your equation, but you may feel differently or less severe than me and I wouldn't have a problem with that.

Supporting and encouraging the actions and behavior of the orange monster...THAT is most definitely a problem.

Updated On: 1/31/17 at 12:16 PM

I can't believe what you say. Because I see what you do. - James Baldwin

Any comment on literally any of the points I raised in my post? Or are you just going to cut and run when someone makes a point that you can't reply to with a gif? I know, it's easier just to go on about whiny liberals, but at least try.

Also, it's worth noting that W Bush didn't roll back Clinton's protections for LGBT folks either- and only a fool would call him a crusader for queer rights. FADA is still the end-game, and no one should be shocked when that gets signed into law.

WOULD EVERYONE PLEASE REMOVE THEIR SOCKS?

madbrian said: "If anyone can provide an example of how such rhetoric ever convinced anyone of anything, I'd love to hear it."

Some fairly harsh words on this very board helped to convince me to vote for Clinton rather than the candidate I'd normally support. I'm not sure that was the right choice on my part, but that's a different matter.

So there's one example.

President Donald J. Trump is determined to protect the rights of all Americans, including the LGBTQ community.

And nobody respects women more than Captain Creamsicle! He said so himself! The energy it must take to desperately defend this creature non-stop at any cost must be positively crippling.

Why on earth would you expect anyone to believe such maniacal crap, especially linking to his FaceBook page?