So here we are again back in The Land of the BroadwayWorld Split.
Seems there are two types of people who post here. There are those who have taken the message of too many simplistic and treacly musicals to heart and who think all you have to do is have a dream and if you stand up and belt your desires to the back row of the second balcony those dreams will come true because dammit it's your dream and nobody's gonna take it away from you! And there's ALWAYS a happy ending.
In the real world, these people are known as "enablers." In the guise of "encouragement" and "positivity," they gloss over almost ANY sense of reality and encourage others to follow through on recipes for disaster (to go with the culinary metaphor) because it's their "dream," and their dreams "feel good."
Then there's the other type of person who posts here. More influenced by theater that is grounded in reality. Able to discuss the good AND the bad of life, encouraging others to hope for the best while preparing for the worst. Around here, we're called "negative" and those who enjoy "urinating on the breakfast cereal of others." In the real world, we are called realists.
Captain_Obvious, what ckeaton pointed out about the narrative of your postings thus far rings true for me, as a reader of those narratives. What Orion and Sueleen wrote is completely grounded in the reality of making it through the world. Don't think you can cover a grand in rent a month? Of course you can't if you have to come up with FIFTY grand in a week for tuition.
I've been doing a search online for an excellent article the New York Times did in the past couple of years about the incredible grind of culinary school, and the fairly small odds that people who graduate from such schools will ever actually make a living as a chef. And for those who do, it's because they spent about 16-18 hours a day peeling potatoes for a couple of years AFTER their graduation in the shadows of full fledged chefs. The point of the article is that it is almost impossible to pay back student loans while being completely demoralized on the lowest rungs of the restaurant ladders for years and years.
I am unable to find the article at NYTimes.com because I must be searching on the wrong key words. I'd recommend the article to both you and Redhot if you had the five bucks or whatever it costs to get archived materials. But thus far I haven't found it.
By the way, it's in the best interests of the culinary schools to imply that you will have a rewarding career as a chef immediately after graduation. But the odds are stronger that you'd get struck by lightning.
Those with the gumption and the fantasy of "opening their own restaurant" have even harder roads to hoe. We're talking 20 hour days then, and MOST restaurants fail within a year and a half.
So, I'm not gonna join the chorus of enablers and say "Oh wow, how great, go for it, why not, how hard can it be, MAKE ME DINNER WHEN YOU GRADUATE."
You really won't be able to afford any ingredients to make people dinner when you graduate.
But good luck with your dream! You will make it if you spread your wings and fly!
Twitter @NamoInExile
Instagram none
Updated On: 8/5/05 at 12:06 PM