DAME,
no offense. but it amazes me that you care Namo's attack so much. You called Wishatony a liar many times as well. Since you don't care about other's feeling, I assume you don't care your own as well.
Well, see, I make assumption again.
Sanda,
You are absolutely right. But WishIhadatony was talking to kids. It was creepy and I am glad a end was put to it. There is a difference. Also.. I want to show you exactly what I wrote on this post that set Namo off..
Namo: ""Exactly where does it "sound" like a "big, extensive investigation was done????" "
Dame: Tomorrows LA times.. which I have a early edition of in my hands."
That is all I said. He took it and ran with that.
Another sad and desperate cry for attention. Poor Namo. I feel so sad for him.
I don't care about the problem between you and Namo. Namo almost made me laugh when he tried to give me some suggestions since he wasn't quite a role model, in my humble opinion.
My issue is that you used to give me the impression that you like to attack people a lot and don't give a damn. I am not saying that is wrong and I believe you have all the rights to do it. But I do think you should have the guts to take other's attack as well.
I do give a damm. Sorry if I gave you the impression I didn't. And I do have the guts to take attacks . What do you think I have been doing on this thread?
Anyway.. have a great Sunday. I am off to the races.
You too. You know I respect you no matter how much I disagree with you. :)
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
"My issue is that you used to give me the impression that you like to attack people a lot and don't give a damn."
That's not an impression, Sanda, it's the truth. And Dame, YOU brought up the Calendar section. Remember? You BELIEVED it was the Calendar section? Which makes zero sense. Such an article wouldn't appear in that section since deadline is before the Barbour story broke. And if it were in the actual paper proper, the one you had in your hands, it most definitely would have been online at LATimes.com. But it's not.
So you can deflect your being called on your BS, (I never said you were a liar, I said you were a BSer, but you're a queen from LA, no big news there) by focusing on me, but PatiB requested access to the story you referenced, and instead you acted all incensed about me.
BSer. Plain and simple.
See namo..
There you go again. I beg you. Get help. I have not lied about anything. I have nothing to prove. Your just a very sick person that needs to create drama with people. Poor thing. GET HELP. BWW is not the place to find it. Now I leave you to swim in yur own venom. Have a great day.
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
"I have nothing to prove."
But if you actually HAD an article that included the points you claimed you WOULD post it and I would apologize to you.
But that will never happen, because you're BSing.
Nope. I just could not care less. You are so transparent. By the way.. I noticed poor elsgr8 was on for a few minutes and you did not waist a second in starting to tear into him. You poor thing. You know.. maybe with all these religous holidays coming up.. someone will pray for you.
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
BS BS BS BS BS BS BS.
Period. End of sentence.
PatiB asked for the article that doesn't exist too. Don't hold back on giving it to her because you feel backed into a corner by me. Send it to her. Oh. That's right. It doesn't exist.
Call the Los Angeles times. Ask them to mail you Fridays paper. And then please leave everyone alone. You are such a child.
I don't have a scanner. Don't even thnk I have the paper anymore.
And by the way.. you are wrong as to when the story broke and when the papers deadline is. And no worries. I would never feel "backed into a corner" by you. The only thing I feel when it comes to you is disgust.
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
MMmmm-hmmmm.
this type of woman
welcome. joined today just to bring this thread back and defend ol' humbert barbour, eh?
problem with this is (the one i'll tackle, that is, i'll let the rest of the pack deal with your frat boy misogyny), she was 15. that's not a woman. and he was 35, not 20. had he been 20 like your youthful foray into the stunning world of sex with a minor, he'd have had to remove the diaper.
Broadway Legend Joined: 11/2/05
"Sometimes its difficult to be in control when a gorgeous young woman is the one seducing you."
That's a truly pathetic statement.
"Sometimes its difficult to be in control when a gorgeous young woman is the one seducing you."
This should read "gorgeous young teenager."
And, "I'm not saying Jim was right in what he did if he did, it but I'm sure many a man out there would fall prey to this type of woman.
Again, this type of "teenager."
It is nice to know that you have so much respect for yourself and other men that you feel that there is no defense when "preyed" upon sexually by a 15 year old teenager.
"This type of thing happens all the time and doesn't get reported. It seems to me she got what she wanted at the time and it didn't bother her till now? WTF."
And, none of us know what she did, or did not want at the time. Again, he may be completely innocent of the charges, or, he may be guilty. We do not know. But, from my very limited vantage point, your assumptions about the alleged victim, and the way you state them, call into question whether you have the ability to really see things objectively. I suggest you go talk to someone about your own apparent concerns with self-control when around attractive teenage girls.
I really want to jump in here with something profound, but you guys already have it covered.
And new guy, your argument it just lame and pathetic.
Edit.
Edit
must you continue to turn every thread into a hate demonstration on your part?
now where have i heard that plea?
You are absoulutely right PLM. I will deleate.
You really don't get him at all, do you? I can assure you, with certainty, that this didn't come from Namo.
So it was you? And no. I don't get Namo at all.
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
Now who's clamoring for who's attention??? I'm sure somebody will fill me in on the "edited" posts, and I have a feeling it's gonna be funny. Laughing-at funny, not laughing-with funny.
Surfgod, love the way you call him "Jim." But why not "Jimmy?" Too familiar? Not quite that close?
surfgod, did you enjoy your time in ASSASSINS?
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
MeeeYOWZA!
Does the name Xenu mean anything to you, surfgod?
Videos