i never miss a good chance to make a wildly rhetorical post based on little more than my own desire for hyperbole.
now the folks signing off on it based on lies, doesn't it mean that they weren't doing their jobs to discover that they were being lied to? i mean, if bush was supposed to know that the intelligence was faulty, shouldn't they have at least spent some cursory time checking out the patriot act? or having an aide or two do so?
i actually have very few problems with the patriot act, zola. i read it and the laws that it referenced and although i am a tad squeamish about some of it, on the whole i think that it was necessary to allow the intelligence agencies that failed so miserably to work more efficiently. that said, i would not be opposed to some small changes to make a few things a little harder to abuse. but to toss it out wholecloth i think is tantamount to raising a white flag. i don't think that the constitution is a suicide pact.
r.i.p. marco, my guardian angel.
...global warming can manifest itself as heat, cool, precipitation, storms, drought, wind, or any other phenomenon, much like a shapeshifter. -- jim geraghty
pray to st. jude
i'm a sonic reducer
he was the gimmicky sort
fenchurch=mejusthavingfun=magwildwood=mmousefan=bkcollector=bradmajors=somethingtotalkabout: the fenchurch mpd collective