Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Unknown User
Joined: 12/31/69
#0Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 9:49pm
Does it strike anyone as eerie that Michael Jackson, who is considered by some to be a pedohile should be making appreances, via Tiff's icon, on BWW, which is happens to be filled with young boys?
Those friggin' icons of MJ are freaky.
Ellie3
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/20/04
#2re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 9:51pmThe icons are equally horrific for us girls.
insomniak
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/7/04
#3re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 9:52pmJose', you have the power to delete it...
Unknown User
Joined: 12/31/69
#4re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 9:53pm
There is no guideline that prohibits unattractive faces...
yet!
Updated On: 12/23/04 at 09:53 PM
#5re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 9:54pmYou are the QuizMaster after all, pull some of your strings!
#6re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 9:56pm
And there shouldn't be!
BTW, blame the mods for this mug, folks! I had pictures of Jason Lewis and Tyson nearly naked. Deleted. I had a photo of Hugh Jackman shirtless but part of his chest was concealed by his arm. Deleted. I had a photo of MJ's head superimposed on Pamela's body. Deleted. I had a, er, tasteful photo of camerangel's boobs (CONCEALED). Deleted.
And now it's come back to this.
Pretty, ain't he?
"Good luck returning my ass!" - Wilhemina Slater
"This is my breakfast, lunch and f***ing dinner right here. I'm not even f***in' joking." - Colin Farrell
Unknown User
Joined: 12/31/69
#7re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 9:56pm
I need a justification. Freaky just isn't one of them.
Sorry.
Although, one would think Tiff might be kind and do everyone a favor and simply remove it herself.
Ellie3
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/20/04
#8re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 9:58pmIs it just me, or is he getting closer? *backs away*
#9re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 10:02pmJose'-Let the boobs come back. We will both be happy.
Unknown User
Joined: 12/31/69
#10re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 10:04pm
LOL.
Your right, Jacob, the boobs are preferable.
But one boob begets more boobs.
#11re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 10:09pmThe more boobs the merrier.
Unknown User
Joined: 12/31/69
#13re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 10:12pmSomehow the words "boobs" and "Michael Jackson" used together are an oxymoron.
#14re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 10:15pm
Ouch. Clearly some people here missed the arguments (also known as "mean-spirited jabs") on the "Michael Jackson's Problem" thread!
So how goes it, Jose'? If I bring back the boobs or shirtless Hugh Jackman, can it stay? (In my defense, the boobs were actually a welcome change - I received more positive feedback and Cam got hit on much more during that time!) Plus somehow I think a very small minority of people will complain at a shirtless Hugh Jackman.
PS. I REALLY miss my pic of MJ on Pamela's body. That way we get the Jacko AND the boobs!
"Good luck returning my ass!" - Wilhemina Slater
"This is my breakfast, lunch and f***ing dinner right here. I'm not even f***in' joking." - Colin Farrell
#15re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 10:15pm
lol
Somehow, MJ and anything is an oxymoron...
#16re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 10:17pm
"Somehow the words "boobs" and "Michael Jackson" used together are an oxymoron."
Than get rid of MJ and keep the BOOBS! Just BOOBS!
LOTS OF BOOBS!
where's jmac lover when you need her.
#17re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 10:19pmI do not object to a shirtless Hugh Jackman. I do not object to a shirt clad Hugh, I do not object to him in anyway...
Unknown User
Joined: 12/31/69
#18re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 10:19pm
Well, Tiff, you pose a hard question.
Your boobs are certainly preferable to those MJ pics you insist on using. Still, Rob does have definite ideas about what constitute a family-friendly board. Dangling boobs don't make the list, but now that I think of it, MJ doesn't exactly fit on the list either.
So, maybe you'll do everyone a favor, and promise never to use his face as an icon again? Pretty please?
Updated On: 12/23/04 at 10:19 PM
#20re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 10:22pmThis is a "family-friendly" board? HAH!
#21re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 10:24pmI don't see anything wrong with it. Michael Jackson has yet to be found guilty in our legal system for being a pedophile. If he is found guilty, then maybe it might be strange...
#22re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 10:24pm
" This is a "family-friendly" board? HAH!"
My thoughts exactly.
Jose'-The boobs are in no way offensive. They show off a very important part of the entertainment industry:looks.
And they look good.
#24re: Michael Jackson on BWW.com
Posted: 12/23/04 at 10:27pm
Personally I think all icons should look like Max Essen.
WOW. Linda thanks.
Videos




