>>
If a major corporation like Ben & Jerry's can make the switch to non-GMO's, so can other corporations. Yup.
But no one can force a company, corporation, etc. to be socially or morally conscious. "Can" is an option - not a requirement.
The GMO aspect is only one factor in a bigger picture. I think there's a larger issue of control and total ownership. It's as if Monsanto is playing the game
Monopoly, and their goal is to win - to be in control of/own everything they set their sights on.
It seems clear that they did not set their sights on developing GMOs with an ultimate goal to benefit society or mankind. If that were the case, why litigate so aggressively, and ruin so many farmers? Why manipulate laws and the legal system to make it so difficult (for anyone - consumer or producer) to differentiate between what is or isn't a GMO?
Although I appreciate B&J's stance on GMOs, I don't necessarily applaud it. GMOs are not the problem, and in fact have potential to benefit the world's population, if incorporated WITHOUT the unbalanced emphasis on capitalistic motivation.
But it's those last two words that are causing problems.
Updated On: 5/30/13 at 09:04 AM