The above examples are downright deceitful and could even have legal ramifications. I doubt anyone is going that route.
Not having heard the NPR story in question, I'd imagine it's a lot more like the New York Times story about theatre producers doing the same things with their reviews. For example, say someone wrote a review tearing apart a show but praised one performer. The show would use that praise which, out of context, would look like the critic was praising the show. Or, there might be a throwaway line like "The cast is certainly one of the most energetic and talented groups assembled on Broadway, but even they can't save the abysmal book...etc." and the show would use the main thought without the caveat clause.
Updated On: 8/24/06 at 12:11 PM