"Nobody Likes To See Dead People on TV" — Page 3

now why would you assume that it would be a lady?

---

She doesn't have to be a lady.

What about women?. Can women be "women" or is that not family friendly?, he asked the person who recently mentioned "starf***ing" for the first time ever on these boards.

---

I think Papa is finally coming around.

"[w]hat exactly is this thread about?"

starf***ing radical right wing fascists and the broadway fans who love them, i think.

---

I don't know what this thread is about anymore, but surely there's enough legit discourse about this president's performance and its aftermath to fill pages.

Read the letters in the NY Times today, those of you who read that biased, liberal rag. I was particularly fascinated by one letter from a woman who accused the Times of spreading "doom and gloom" after the upbeat speech Bush supposedly delivered. I don't think he's exactly dabbling in Reagan's "Morning in America." As Master and others have posted, it's "mourning" in America. Also in the dirty liberal propaganda sheet today: A whole page devoted to the faces of the 64 dead. DEAD. In his speech, Bush euphemised the death of these men and women, many of whom are 18 and 19, by saying "...they paid the ultimate sacrifice." But avoiding the "d" word is just part of the campaign to avoid too much ugly shock as we stand awed by his perserverence.

---

Even his malapropisms have a minimizing effect. In his press conference he referred to the people "who lost their life." Actually one person loses his or her life, more than one lose "their lives."

Unless of course, it ISN'T a malapropism but rather part of what Papa thinks is his desire to APPEAR like a bumpkin and then zoom in for the kill. In which case it's wildly offensive!

---