#26
Posted: 2/24/11 at 4:08pm
Imagine how much the Justice Department will save by not defending DOMA!
Obama Orders End to Defense of Federal Gay Marriage Law — Page 2
#27
Posted: 2/24/11 at 4:09pm
I'm curious, though, as to why the about-face. Did God get out of the mix?
#28
Posted: 2/24/11 at 4:29pm
God is still in the mix but Obama has moved from wrestling with the issue to grappling with it.
#29
Posted: 2/24/11 at 4:32pm
Time to try and start winning back the gays, what with that election coming up in a year and half, I guess.
#30
Chaos already is ensuing
Posted: 2/25/11 at 3:32pm
Chaos already is ensuing
"Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in the world they've been given than to explore the power they have to change it. Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration. It's a dare. Impossible is potential. Impossible is temporary. Impossible is nothing.”
~ Muhammad Ali
#31
Posted: 2/25/11 at 3:54pm
Better build your bunkers, breeders! We're dropping gay-bombs in America and we're going to do it all willy-nilly.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
#32
Posted: 2/25/11 at 3:57pm
Of course the GOP is stuck in the middle. One Democrat POTUS signs DOMA into law, one Democrat POTUS repeals it. Think of all the money that could be saved if Democrats stuck to one platform.
If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
#33
Posted: 2/25/11 at 4:04pm
Yes, because clearly this is what our government is spending all their money on.
#34
Posted: 2/25/11 at 4:06pm
Goth, you have a point.
So we can assume that the GOP will simply shrug and chalk it up to Democrat fickleness, since it has nothing to do with them, right?
So we can assume that the GOP will simply shrug and chalk it up to Democrat fickleness, since it has nothing to do with them, right?
#35
Posted: 2/25/11 at 4:08pm
Reg, it's not about them it's about their CHILDREN.
#36
Posted: 2/25/11 at 4:11pm
Yes, Jordan, but as Goth points out, Republicans never wanted this in the first place.
I imagine they're happy to have it go away.
I imagine they're happy to have it go away.
#37
Posted: 2/25/11 at 4:14pm
But if this goes away, who will they teach their children to hate?
#38
Posted: 2/25/11 at 4:16pm
Interesting. I JUST heard Newt Gingrich explain that Bill Clinton had NOTHING to do with the 4 years of balanced budgets that he drew up and the congress passed. NOW I hear that the Republican Party who wrote and passed DOMA had NOTHING to do with it since Bill Clinton signed it. Think of all the money that could be saved if Republicans stuck to one talking point.
.jpg?format=auto&width=365)
Tickets From $59
Tickets From $70
Tickets From $72
Tickets From $106
