henrik, how much can (or should) a “step” mean if it effects no practical changes in the Church or its doctrine? If a “step” is merely symbolic, merely rhetoric – as, in my opinion, this Pope’s “steps” have been – it can all be undone in the blink of an eye. Just look at how wildly the tone swung from Ratzinger to Francis. What if the Pope were to die tomorrow and get replaced by another Ratzinger – or someone worse?
Without any practical effects, all “The Advocate” is recognizing here is P.R., and that’s a soulless, conscience-less thing to do, especially in a year with Edie Windsor in the offing.
Namo was spot-on when he wrote “Soooo soooo grateful for crumbs.” That may have been passable once upon a time, but with the whole cookie in sight, crumbs are only going to keep us on the ground.
(I’m also shooting for Worst Metaphor of the Day; around here, there’s usually stiff competition for that award.)
CHURCH DOOR TOUCAN GAY MARKETING PUPPIES MUSICAL THEATER STAPLES PERIOD OIL BITCHY SNARK HOLES
Updated On: 12/18/13 at 08:57 AM