Craig, I guess I didn't mean "original" in its purest form, as in "not based on any previously existing material." (the Academy's definition?)
That's not what I meant at all. (I know there was an earlier thread discussing "original" musicals, so I see what you're saying.)
However, all I meant is that I don't want a spontaneously conceived sequel or an impromptu franchise created out of every hit movie. Part 2, 3 or 6.
I stopped going to movies with numbers after them, about six years ago, and I've never regretted it.
But something intended and conceived as a trilogy (like Lord of the Rings)... I'm fine with that.
I'm not fine with them splitting the last Potter book into two films and milking it. I'm fine with the Chronicles of Narnia movies, though, based on each of the books.
I'm fine with the Bond movies in theory (although personally I've lost interest in them), because they were conceived as a series of stories by the author.
But when we keep getting Shrek 6, Are We Really Done Yet Still? or The Even Darker Knight, it just irritates me. And bores me.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22