Posted: 2/18/18 at 4:11pm
Posted: 2/18/18 at 9:28pm
Jay got this head on. Erik if this is a sample of the support Bernie would have in 2020 we're in trouble and maybe shouldn't bother.
Posted: 2/18/18 at 9:42pm
This forum is certainly not representative of Bernie support - almost no one here supported Bernie in 2016.
Posted: 2/22/18 at 2:56pm
You're not from here. You don't get the aversion to the word Socialism the dumb nuts of this country have. Joe Biden would win.
Posted: 2/22/18 at 3:05pm
Wouldn't doubt some members in here were sucked in by Bernie Babies... Hmm. Oh, so those were Russian bots? No way PJ.
Posted: 3/1/18 at 4:38pm
If Sanders had been the nominee and lost to Trump (which may or may not have happened, we will never know), you can bet that millions would be smugly arguing that if only we had had the good sense to have nominated Clinton instead of Sanders, Clinton would have surely beaten Trump (which, as it happens, we know for a fact is not at all a persuasive premise - because she was the nominee and Trump won... but does anyone believe that if Sanders had been nominated and lost the election, it wouldn't be a widely, bitterly and smugly held belief that Clinton would have clearly won had she rather than Sanders been nominated?).
American politics. It's insane.
Updated On: 3/4/18 at 04:38 PM
Posted: 3/4/18 at 2:17pm
The same people I grew up with and looked at me incredulously when I said I was for Clinton, give me the same look when I tell them that I'm a socialist. Of course many of us want Bernie, and thought he was the better candidate for 2016, like Henri says we'll never know. Maybe we need a different candidate. I don't think we'll be running against Trump.
.jpg?format=auto&width=300)
