Should Apollo 11 Lunar Landing site be a World Heritage Site
Should Apollo 11 Lunar Landing site be a World Heritage Site#1
Posted: 7/29/13 at 2:52pm
Should World Heritage status be given to the Apollo 11 Lunar Landing location on the moon?
Even a better question is...should Congress waste time AND money on an actual bill for this?
The proposal has received a thumbs-down response from the Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) organization, based in Washington, D.C.
In a July 24 statement, the group gave Edwards and co-sponsor Johnson their "Porkers of the Month" honor "for straying so far from reality's orbit, wasting the taxpayers' money on the paper and ink on which H.R. 2617 is written, and engaging in sheer 'lunarcy.'"
Complete article
Should Apollo 11 Lunar Landing site be a World Heritage Site#2
Posted: 7/29/13 at 2:57pmWhy did they need to make a pun out of "lunacy"? The root is already in there.
Should Apollo 11 Lunar Landing site be a World Heritage Site#2
Posted: 7/29/13 at 3:11pmHA good catch Kad - I was so annoyed at more Congress WASTE that I didn't stop to notice that.
Should Apollo 11 Lunar Landing site be a World Heritage Site#3
Posted: 7/29/13 at 5:02pmI like to deliberately miss the point sometimes.
Should Apollo 11 Lunar Landing site be a World Heritage Site#4
Posted: 7/29/13 at 5:33pm
Remember, this is the House of Representatives, which has 40 times now voted to repeal the Affordable Care Act.
Lunarcy is a bit of a break from all the lunacy.
Should Apollo 11 Lunar Landing site be a World Heritage Site#5
Posted: 7/30/13 at 11:25pmThe "It's Out of This World" Act. In every way.
Videos

